Přehled
Rozhodnutí
SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 6548/22
Cano NESHEVSKI and SKROMNOST DOOEL BITOLA
against North Macedonia
(see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 19 February 2026 as a Committee composed of:
Stéphane Pisani, President,
Juha Lavapuro,
Hugh Mercer, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 26 January 2022,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
They were represented by Mr I. Petkovski, a lawyer practising in Bitola.
The applicants’ complaints under Articles 6 and 7 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 thereof, concerning the alleged lack of a legal basis for the fines imposed on the applicants under the Food Safety Act and the alleged disproportionality of those fines, the lack of an oral hearing in the ensuing proceedings before the administrative courts, as well as the alleged lack of adequate reasoning to the courts’ decisions, were communicated to the Government of North Macedonia (“the Government”).
The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against North Macedonia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them, jointly, the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above‑mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 12 March 2026.
Viktoriya Maradudina Stéphane Pisani
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
Application raising complaints under Articles 6 and 7 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1
Application no. | Applicant’s name Year of birth/ | Date of receipt of Government’s declaration | Date of receipt of applicants’ declaration | Amount awarded for pecuniary, non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses to the applicants jointly (in euros)[1] |
6548/22 26/01/2022 | Cano NESHEVSKI 1954 SKROMNOST DOOEL BITOLA 1998 | 20/01/2026 | 09/12/2025 | 10,700 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.