Přehled

Text rozhodnutí
Datum rozhodnutí
9.4.2026
Rozhodovací formace
Významnost
3
Číslo stížnosti / sp. zn.

Rozhodnutí

SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 36961/20
Sinan KOÇUM
against Türkiye

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 9 April 2026 as a Committee composed of:

Stéphane Pisani, President,
Juha Lavapuro,
Hugh Mercer, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 11 August 2020,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

  • FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant, Mr Sinan Koçum, was born in 1979. He was represented by Mr V. Çetin, a lawyer practising in İzmir.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the Enforcement Court’s failure to hold a public hearing in person, as well as under Article 10 of the Convention concerning a breach of the right to freedom of expression on account of the imposition of a disciplinary sanction on the applicant were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits.

By letter dated 27 October 2025, sent to the applicant’s representative through the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms), the representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the application had expired on 11 June 2025 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s representative’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter was downloaded by the applicant’s representative on 27 October 2025. No answer to it has been received.

  • THE LAW

In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application.

Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 13 May 2026.

Viktoriya Maradudina Stéphane Pisani
Acting Deputy Registrar President