SERT A OSTATNÍ proti Turecku

Přehled

Text rozhodnutí

Datum rozhodnutí

3.12.2024

Rozhodovací formace

výbor

Významnost

Číslo stížnosti / sp. zn.

15659/20

Rozsudek

SECOND SECTION

CASE OF SERT AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE

(Applications nos. 15659/20 and 206 others)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

3 December 2024

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Sert and Others v. Türkiye,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

Pauliine Koskelo, President,
Jovan Ilievski,
Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to:

the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the applicants listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein;

the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 5 of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion regarding the commission of an offence, the alleged lack of relevant and sufficient reasons when ordering and extending the pre-trial detention, the length of pre-trial detention, the ineffectiveness of the judicial review of the lawfulness of detention and the absence of a remedy to obtain compensation to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), represented by their then Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, former Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Turkey, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications;

the parties’ observations;

the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;

Having deliberated in private on 12 November 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (for further background information see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 3-9 and §§ 106-07, 20 July 2021).

2. On various dates, the applicants were arrested and placed in pre-trial detention, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, § 58, 3 March 2020). The detention orders relied principally on the nature of the alleged offence, the state of the evidence and the potential sentence. It was also noted that investigations into the coup attempt were being conducted across the country, that statements had not yet been taken from all the suspects and that the alleged offence was among the “catalogue” offences listed in Article 100 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) (for the text of Article 100 of the CCP, as relevant, see Baş, cited above, § 61). It appears from the initial detention orders and the documents available in the case files that the majority of the applicants were identified as users of the ByLock messaging system. Moreover, some of the applicants were suspected of being affiliated with the FETÖ/PDY based on witness statements, or of financing the FETÖ/PDY in view of their use of accounts in Bank Asya – a bank allegedly linked to FETÖ/PDY –, possession of pro-FETÖ/PDY publications and/or United States one-dollar bills with an “F” serial number (denoting the initial of the forename “Fetullah”), and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. The challenges brought by the applicants against their detention, including by reason of the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion of having committed the offence imputed to them, were dismissed, including by the Constitutional Court.

3. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts. It appears that, in some of the applications, the criminal proceedings are still pending before appeal courts or the Constitutional Court.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT

JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

4. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION

5. The applicants complained that there had been no specific evidence giving rise to a reasonable suspicion, within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention, that they had committed a criminal offence necessitating, in particular, their initial pre-trial detention.

6. The Government urged the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible in respect of the applicants who had not made use of the compensatory remedy under Article 141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or whose compensation claims were still pending. They further asked the Court to declare the applications inadmissible for abuse of the right of application to the extent that the applicants had not informed the Court of the developments in their cases following the lodging of their applications.

7. The Court notes that similar objections have already been dismissed in other cases against Türkiye (see, for instance, Baş, cited above, §§ 118-21, and Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 57-64, 23 November 2021), and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.

8. The Court notes that, when ordering the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, the magistrate’s courts sought to justify their decisions by making a general reference to Article 100 of the CCP and the potential sentence, as well as to “the evidence in the file”. However, in doing so, they simply cited the wording of the provision in question, without actually specifying what the evidence in question entailed and why it constituted a reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offence in question. The Court refers in this connection to its findings in the judgment of Baş (cited above, §§ 190‑95), according to which the vague and general references to the wording of Article 100 of the CCP and to the evidence in the file cannot be regarded as sufficient to justify the “reasonableness” of the suspicion on which the applicants’ detention was supposed to have been based, in the absence either of a specific assessment of the individual items of evidence in the file, or of any information available in the file at the material time that could have justified the suspicion against the applicants, or of any other kinds of verifiable material or facts.

9. The Court further notes that the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention orders were mainly based on information indicating their use of the ByLock messaging system, banking activities considered as financing the FETÖ/PDY, subscriptions to certain pro-FETÖ/PDY publications, having in their possessions United States one‑dollar bills with an “F” serial number, and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. To the extent that the detention orders have taken into account the applicants’ alleged use of the ByLock messaging system, the Court notes that it has already found that the use of ByLock alone was not of a nature to constitute “reasonable suspicion” within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) in respect of the offence attributed to the applicants (see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 151-85, 20 July 2021, and Taner Kılıç v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 208/18, §§102-03 and 106-09, 31 May 2022). The Court also notes that as regards some of the applicants, the Government have referred to the existence of witness statements justifying the measures in question. It observes, however, that there are no statements in the case files referring to concrete and specific facts that may have given rise to a reasonable suspicion against the applicants concerned at the material time. The Court further considers, as relevant, that the other acts imputed to the applicants (see paragraph 2 above) were merely circumstantial elements which, in the absence of any other information capable of justifying the suspicions in question, benefited from the presumption of legality and cannot reasonably be regarded as constituting a body of evidence demonstrating the applicants’ membership of a terrorist organisation (compare Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 104-05 and the cases cited therein).

10. Since the Government have not provided any other indications, “facts” or “information” capable of satisfying it that the applicants were “reasonably suspected”, at the time of their initial detention, of having committed the alleged offence, the Court finds that the requirements of Article 5 § 1 (c) regarding the “reasonableness” of a suspicion justifying detention have not been satisfied (see Baş, cited above, § 195, and Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 114-16). At this juncture, it cannot be maintained, as the Government argued in their observations, that the fact that the applicants were not members of the judiciary had any bearing on the conclusion reached. It finally considers that while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (compare Baş, cited above, §§ 115-16 and §§ 196‑201). It therefore concludes that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.

OTHER COMPLAINTS

11. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).

APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

12. The applicants, except for the applicants in applications nos. 17398/20, 21419/20, 32063/20, 39043/20, 41885/20, 47622/20, 51256/20, 51814/20, 41/21, 1386/21, 1969/21, 2000/21, 3082/21, 3454/21, 37266/21 and 39745/21, requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non‑pecuniary damage within the time-limit allotted. Most of the applicants in question also claimed pecuniary damage, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.

13. The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.

14. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102‑07), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 17398/20, 21419/20, 32063/20, 39043/20, 41885/20, 47622/20, 51256/20, 51814/20, 41/21, 1386/21, 1969/21, 2000/21, 3082/21, 3454/21, 37266/21 and 39745/21, a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

Decides to join the applications;
Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence, admissible;
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence;
Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Article 5 of the Convention;
Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay each applicant, with the exception of the applicants in applications nos. 17398/20, 21419/20, 32063/20, 39043/20, 41885/20, 47622/20, 51256/20, 51814/20, 41/21, 1386/21, 1969/21, 2000/21, 3082/21, 3454/21, 37266/21 and 39745/21, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on this amount, which is to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 3 December 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Dorothee von Arnim Pauliine Koskelo
Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of cases:

No.	Application no.	Case name	Lodged on	Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality	Represented by
1.	15659/20	Sert v. Türkiye	12/03/2020	İzzetdin SERT 1986 Aydın Turkish	Turgay KALE
2.	16027/20	Ateş v. Türkiye	20/03/2020	Kenan ATEŞ 1971 Konya Turkish
3.	16033/20	Demirci v. Türkiye	18/03/2020	Mehmet DEMİRCİ 1978 Hatay Turkish	Ali Berk SABANOGLU
4.	16045/20	Ateş v. Türkiye	18/03/2020	Ramazan ATEŞ 1990 İzmir Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
5.	16046/20	Cebesoy v. Türkiye	20/03/2020	Halil CEBESOY 1971 Manisa Turkish
6.	16061/20	Karakuş v. Türkiye	16/03/2020	Özcan KARAKUŞ 1974 Konya Turkish	İlyas KARATAŞ
7.	16110/20	Kiremit v. Türkiye	20/03/2020	Ahmet KİREMİT 1990 Aksaray Turkish	Akerke ABDYKALYKOVA ONAT
8.	16180/20	Yuvarlak v. Türkiye	19/03/2020	İlhan YUVARLAK 1977 İstanbul Turkish	Yeliz HANOĞLU
9.	16384/20	Topdemir v. Türkiye	17/03/2020	Mehmet TOPDEMİR 1980 Ankara Turkish	Hacer TOPDEMİR
10.	16392/20	Uyanık v. Türkiye	26/03/2020	Mustafa UYANIK 1974 Mersin Turkish	Akil SIRKINTI
11.	16442/20	Tekin v. Türkiye	20/03/2020	Mustafa TEKİN 1982 Konya Turkish	Leyla MESUTOĞLU
12.	16447/20	Doğan v. Türkiye	19/03/2020	Tuncay DOĞAN 1975 Ankara Turkish	Mustafa SOYLU
13.	16487/20	Alemdar v. Türkiye	27/03/2020	Ender ALEMDAR 1975 Zonguldak Turkish	Erdi KOSTİK
14.	16566/20	Telo v. Türkiye	13/03/2020	Cihat TELO 1982 Kocaeli Turkish	Şule Şükran TELO
15.	16573/20	Keskin v. Türkiye	13/03/2020	Yener KESKİN 1982 Kayseri Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
16.	16781/20	Kiremit v. Türkiye	26/03/2020	Zehra KİREMİT 1991 Aksaray Turkish	Akerke ABDYKALYKOVA ONAT
17.	16843/20	Kenru v. Türkiye	26/03/2020	Cumali KENRU 1981 Adana Turkish	Akil SIRKINTI
18.	16844/20	Alpay v. Türkiye	26/03/2020	Ekrem ALPAY 1972 Ankara Turkish
19.	16852/20	Özcan v. Türkiye	16/03/2020	Mehmet Ali ÖZCAN 1969 Konya Turkish	İhsan MAKAS
20.	16862/20	Aslan v. Türkiye	23/03/2020	Tunçay ASLAN 1969 Bursa Turkish
21.	16904/20	Balık v. Türkiye	09/04/2020	Onur BALIK 1992 Kocaeli Turkish	Davut UĞUR
22.	16912/20	Sevinç v. Türkiye	27/03/2020	Bılal SEVİNÇ 1972 Ankara Turkish
23.	16946/20	Karadayi v. Türkiye	02/04/2020	Halil KARADAYI 1990 Balıkesir Turkish	Huseyin KARADAYI
24.	16947/20	Buldu v. Türkiye	19/03/2020	Furkan BULDU 1985 Antalya Turkish
25.	17015/20	Ak v. Türkiye	14/04/2020	Aydın AK 1975 Kütahya Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
26.	17398/20	Aygün v. Türkiye	09/04/2020	Maruf AYGÜN 1994 Batman Turkish
27.	17441/20	Akyol v. Türkiye	03/04/2020	Aytaç AKYOL 1980 Kırşehir Turkish	Dudu ERTUNÇ
28.	17478/20	Bozdağ v. Türkiye	03/04/2020	Veysel BOZDAĞ 1981 Denizli Turkish	Enes Malik KILIÇ
29.	17693/20	Horozcu v. Türkiye	03/04/2020	Ali HOROZCU 1974 Burdur Turkish	Zülal BÜKER
30.	17919/20	Demir v. Türkiye	13/04/2020	Fatih DEMİR 1975 Giresun Turkish	Levent MAZILIGÜNEY
31.	17968/20	Keskin v. Türkiye	17/04/2020	Ali KESKİN 1975 Trabzon Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
32.	18743/20	Yükler v. Türkiye	21/04/2020	Murat YÜKLER 1987 Kilis Turkish
33.	19024/20	Sağlık v. Türkiye	22/04/2020	Ahmet Faruk SAĞLIK 1989 Samsun Turkish	Muhammed Nuh POLAT
34.	19145/20	Orhan v. Türkiye	07/05/2020	Yalçın ORHAN 1967 İzmir Turkish	Mustafa ORHAN
35.	19180/20	Adem v. Türkiye	06/05/2020	Muzaffer ADEM 1963 Aydın Turkish
36.	20046/20	Gülenç v. Türkiye	19/03/2020	Murat GÜLENÇ 1979 Manisa Turkish	Gönül GÜLENÇ
37.	20426/20	Altun v. Türkiye	30/04/2020	Sadullah ALTUN 1972 İstanbul Turkish	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
38.	20843/20	İlter v. Türkiye	30/04/2020	Ramazan İLTER 1990 İstanbul Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
39.	20850/20	Gözütok v. Türkiye	12/05/2020	Mevlüt GÖZÜTOK 1981 Yalova Turkish	Hülya GÖZÜTOK
40.	20990/20	Tezcan v. Türkiye	28/04/2020	Ertan TEZCAN 1974 Konya Turkish	Sema TEZCAN
41.	21194/20	Lafcı v. Türkiye	06/05/2020	Burak LAFCI 1991 Mersin Turkish	Halime LAFCI
42.	21320/20	Tekin v. Türkiye	08/04/2020	Ali TEKİN 1984 Isparta Turkish	Muhammed Talha YILMAZ
43.	21419/20	Öztürk v. Türkiye	05/05/2020	Mehmet ÖZTÜRK 1982 Bursa Turkish	Filiz SELVİ ÖZTÜRK
44.	21462/20	Koçoğlu v. Türkiye	29/04/2020	Muammer Mecid KOÇOĞLU 1989 Balıkesir Turkish	Hilal BALIKÇI
45.	21730/20	Aktunç v. Türkiye	27/04/2020	Arslan AKTUNÇ 1980 Konya Turkish	Samet YILMAZ
46.	21770/20	Adiyeke v. Türkiye	11/05/2020	Ümran ADİYEKE 1992 Siirt Turkish	Mehmet SATICI
47.	22976/20	Ateş v. Türkiye	21/05/2020	Ramazan ATEŞ 1982 Afyonkarahisar Turkish	Ali ATEŞ
48.	23035/20	Taşcı v. Türkiye	08/06/2020	Faruk Aydın TAŞCI 1983 İzmir Turkish
49.	23055/20	Şaşmaz v. Türkiye	22/05/2020	Yusuf ŞAŞMAZ 1988 İstanbul Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
50.	23075/20	Demir v. Türkiye	22/05/2020	Osman DEMİR 1976 Bursa Turkish
51.	23153/20	Özkan v. Türkiye	08/05/2020	Murat ÖZKAN 1975 Bolu Turkish	Fatma ÖZTÜRK
52.	23317/20	Meydan v. Türkiye	13/05/2020	Muzaffer MEYDAN 1981 Balıkesir Turkish	Hakan EFE
53.	23361/20	Ayva v. Türkiye	27/05/2020	Ali AYVA 1973 Ankara Turkish
54.	23687/20	Baysal v. Türkiye	13/05/2020	Ali İhsan BAYSAL 1965 Balıkesir Turkish	Mustafa ÇABAS
55.	23691/20	Yumurtacı v. Türkiye	15/05/2020	Murat YUMURTACI 1976 Karabük Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
56.	23894/20	Dal v. Türkiye	27/05/2020	Adem DAL 1990 Erzincan Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
57.	24024/20	Ataş v. Türkiye	29/05/2020	Aşkın ATAŞ 1983 Sivas Turkish	Muhammed Mustafa GÜRSOY
58.	24050/20	Gökalp v. Türkiye	03/06/2020	Halim GÖKALP 1986 Ankara Turkish
59.	24103/20	Çiçek v. Türkiye	29/05/2020	Mustafa ÇİÇEK 1980 Samsun Turkish	Tahir EREN
60.	24275/20	Adıgüzel v. Türkiye	01/06/2020	Remzi ADIGÜZEL 1973 İstanbul Turkish	Fikret ADIGÜZEL
61.	24405/20	Yorulmaz v. Türkiye	15/05/2020	Tümay YORULMAZ 1982 Eskişehir Turkish
62.	24639/20	Baydovan v. Türkiye	10/06/2020	Mustafa BAYDOVAN 1992 Mersin Turkish	Mehmet ÖNCÜ
63.	24659/20	Arslan v. Türkiye	21/05/2020	Metin ARSLAN 1976 Eskisehir Turkish	Ulviye Özge CAZ ÖZKAYA
64.	24843/20	Atlar v. Türkiye	10/06/2020	Yusuf ATLAR 1983 Hatay Turkish
65.	25219/20	Ulaş v. Türkiye	05/06/2020	İdris ULAŞ 1984 Ankara Turkish
66.	25520/20	Tercan v. Türkiye	05/06/2020	Muhittin TERCAN 1983 Bursa Turkish	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
67.	25546/20	Akbaba v. Türkiye	24/06/2020	Mahmut Temur AKBABA 1989 Aydın Turkish
68.	25785/20	Kılıç v. Türkiye	19/06/2020	Yavuz KILIÇ 1984 Aydın Turkish	Ömer Faruk YILDIRIM
69.	26804/20	Karabacak v. Türkiye	09/06/2020	Ensar KARABACAK 1966 Balıkesir Turkish	Burcu HAS
70.	26836/20	Güngör v. Türkiye	11/06/2020	Faruk GÜNGÖR 1979 Aksaray Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
71.	26901/20	Kardaş v. Türkiye	11/06/2020	Ömer KARDAŞ 1974 Erzurum Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
72.	27091/20	Gültekin v. Türkiye	24/06/2020	Abdurrezzak GÜLTEKİN 1989 Aydın Turkish	Funda GÜLTEKİN
73.	27142/20	Batmaz v. Türkiye	18/06/2020	Gonca BATMAZ 1977 Kütahya Turkish	Ayten İZMIRLİ
74.	27268/20	Kaya v. Türkiye	19/06/2020	Alican KAYA 1990 Balıkesir Turkish	Burcu HAS
75.	27271/20	Yavuz v. Türkiye	12/06/2020	Bilal YAVUZ 1989 Ankara Turkish	Hakan EFE
76.	27404/20	Özcan v. Türkiye	05/06/2020	Hasan ÖZCAN 1975 İzmir Turkish	Yunus Cevher KAVÇAKAR
77.	27911/20	Sözen v. Türkiye	01/07/2020	Yaşar SÖZEN 1980 Samsun Turkish	Tolga UÇAR
78.	28026/20	Yalçın v. Türkiye	19/06/2020	Osman YALÇIN 1979 İstanbul Turkish	Sümeyye Sema COŞAN
79.	28357/20	Şenocak v. Türkiye	10/06/2020	Fevzi Cem ŞENOCAK 1972 Samsun Turkish
80.	28890/20	Çevik v. Türkiye	01/07/2020	Murat ÇEVİK 1977 Kayseri Turkish	Beytullah ÖZTÜRK
81.	28936/20	Kavçakar v. Türkiye	10/06/2020	Emre KAVÇAKAR 1990 Burdur Turkish	Yunus Cevher KAVÇAKAR
82.	29075/20	Uğur v. Türkiye	23/06/2020	Bekir UĞUR 1988 Konya Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
83.	29970/20	Kenben v. Türkiye	25/06/2020	Osman KENBEN 1992 İstanbul Turkish	Hurşit KENBEN
84.	30009/20	Özen v. Türkiye	08/07/2020	Mehmet ÖZEN 1975 Konya Turkish	Sefanur BOZGÖZ
85.	30118/20	Polat v. Türkiye	23/06/2020	Ahmet POLAT 1980 İzmir Turkish	Nurullah TEKİN
86.	30681/20	Ançaza v. Türkiye	08/07/2020	Halil İbrahim ANÇAZA 1969 Kocaeli Turkish	Enes Malik KILIÇ
87.	31092/20	Çalışkan v. Türkiye	03/07/2020	Mehmet ÇALIŞKAN 1976 İzmir Turkish	Özlem SUZAN
88.	31315/20	Polat v. Türkiye	06/07/2020	Yusuf POLAT 1971 Ankara Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
89.	31502/20	Çakmak v. Türkiye	09/07/2020	Abdulbaki ÇAKMAK 1987 Ankara Turkish	Mehmet ÖNCÜ
90.	31504/20	Bulcun v. Türkiye	14/07/2020	Tamer BULCUN 1976 Kırıkkale Turkish	Muhammet Uğur DEMİRKAN
91.	32063/20	Kazan v. Türkiye	27/07/2020	Zübeyir KAZAN 1995 İstanbul Turkish
92.	32952/20	Artantaş v. Türkiye	24/07/2020	Yasemin ARTANTAŞ 1990 İstanbul Turkish	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
93.	33282/20	Kavak v. Türkiye	23/07/2020	İsmail KAVAK 1983 İstanbul Turkish	Nurullah YILDIRIM
94.	33405/20	İncebacak v. Türkiye	21/07/2020	Elif İNCEBACAK 1988 Çankırı Turkish	Feyzullah ALTAŞ
95.	33601/20	Esgiyer v. Türkiye	17/06/2020	Hacı Mustafa ESGİYER 1981 Basselland Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
96.	33767/20	Altuntaş v. Türkiye	22/07/2020	Abdullah ALTUNTAŞ 1985 Ankara Turkish	İsmail ALTUNTAŞ
97.	33856/20	Abbas v. Türkiye	29/07/2020	Ersin ABBAS 1993 Tokat Turkish	Seher YETİSGEN
98.	34393/20	Çetin v. Türkiye	14/07/2020	Nurullah ÇETİN 1976 Kayseri Turkish	Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ
99.	34693/20	Zengin v. Türkiye	16/07/2020	Yasin ZENGİN 1990 Elazığ Turkish	Elif Süeda ÖZDEMİR
100.	34765/20	Doğanay v. Türkiye	17/07/2020	Ali DOĞANAY 1975 Konya Turkish
101.	34783/20	Bedir v. Türkiye	17/07/2020	Mehmet BEDİR 1967 Çorum Turkish
102.	34904/20	Çelik v. Türkiye	07/07/2020	Saniye ÇELİK 1975 Konya Turkish	Leyla MESUTOĞLU
103.	35674/20	Çakmak v. Türkiye	29/07/2020	Fatih ÇAKMAK 1991 Mersin Turkish	Merve Vildan DUMAN
104.	35719/20	Karaçalıoğlu v. Türkiye	08/07/2020	Hulusi KARAÇALIOĞLU 1967 Ankara Turkish	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
105.	35753/20	Işık v. Türkiye	04/08/2020	Mehmet IŞIK 1985 Adıyaman Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
106.	35889/20	Öngün v. Türkiye	08/07/2020	Mustafa ÖNGÜN 1980 Trabzon Turkish
107.	36161/20	Pınar v. Türkiye	29/07/2020	Hasan Hüseyin PINAR 1977 Manisa Turkish	Akkız KARDEŞLER
108.	38352/20	Akkuş v. Türkiye	17/08/2020	Yıldırım AKKUŞ 1974 Bursa Turkish	Ebubekir RENK
109.	38459/20	Yildiz v. Türkiye	12/08/2020	İsa YILDIZ 1978 Adana Turkish	Belma KAYRAN
110.	39043/20	Büyüköz v. Türkiye	18/08/2020	Muammer BÜYÜKÖZ 1990 Yozgat Turkish	Yakup ŞAHİN
111.	39961/20	Bal v. Türkiye	25/08/2020	Mehmet BAL 1964 Bursa Turkish
112.	41545/20	Taşboğaz v. Türkiye	01/09/2020	Eyüp TAŞBOĞAZ 1978 İstanbul Turkish	Burak ÇAĞ
113.	41551/20	Acar v. Türkiye	28/08/2020	Kamil ACAR 1964 Uşak Turkish	Halil ÇETİN
114.	41885/20	Yılmaz v. Türkiye	19/08/2020	Ferhat YILMAZ 1981 Giresun Turkish	Murat YILMAZ
115.	42199/20	Kaya v. Türkiye	03/09/2020	Rıdvan KAYA 1993 Antalya Turkish	Nurgül YAYMAN YILMAZ
116.	43040/20	Taymaz v. Türkiye	15/09/2020	Seyit Ahmet TAYMAZ 1974 Ankara Turkish	Bekir DÖNMEZ
117.	43099/20	Kurşun v. Türkiye	10/09/2020	Günal KURŞUN 1975 Ankara Turkish	Özlem YILDIZ
118.	43205/20	Tuşan v. Türkiye	18/09/2020	Zülfükar TUŞAN 1985 Hatay Turkish	Esma TUŞAN
119.	43230/20	Aydın v. Türkiye	15/09/2020	Bekir AYDIN 1975 Konya Turkish	Güliz Rabia TEKİN
120.	43239/20	Şimşek v. Türkiye	11/09/2020	Nejdet ŞİMŞEK 1973 Sivas Turkish	Büşra KURT KÜÇÜK
121.	43660/20	Güneri v. Türkiye	24/09/2020	Erol GÜNERI 1985 Balıkesir Turkish
122.	43990/20	Likoğlu v. Türkiye	16/09/2020	Fatih LİKOĞLU 1979 Afyonkarahisar Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
123.	44002/20	Polat v. Türkiye	15/09/2020	Bünyamin POLAT 1980 Eskişehir Turkish	Hüseyin Mahir ERDOĞMUŞ
124.	44088/20	Yüksel v. Türkiye	03/09/2020	Mehmet YÜKSEL 1987 Gaziantep Turkish	Murat İLHAN
125.	44928/20	Kara v. Türkiye	21/09/2020	Ender KARA 1974 Manisa Turkish	Asım Burak GÜNEŞ
126.	45251/20	Yiğit v. Türkiye	02/10/2020	İrfan YİĞİT 1978 Balıkesir Turkish	Vildan YİĞİT
127.	45836/20	Dokuz v. Türkiye	30/09/2020	Abdullah DOKUZ 1987 Niğde Turkish	Rabiye DOKUZ
128.	46468/20	Can v. Türkiye	08/10/2020	Turan CAN 1982 Düzce Turkish	Coşkun TAŞKIN
129.	46879/20	Çoban v. Türkiye	08/10/2020	Fatih ÇOBAN 1982 Aydın Turkish	İshak IŞIK
130.	47307/20	Kör v. Türkiye	14/10/2020	Hüseyin KÖR 1991 Çorum Turkish	Kazım DEMİR
131.	47348/20	Polat v. Türkiye	13/10/2020	Sedat POLAT 1975 Adana Turkish	Akil SIRKINTI
132.	47378/20	Kanat v. Türkiye	12/10/2020	Orhan KANAT 1971 Kütahya Turkish	Memnune Melike AKYILDIZ
133.	47622/20	Şenyurt v. Türkiye	22/10/2020	Şenol ŞENYURT 1984 İstanbul Turkish
134.	47812/20	Gülek v. Türkiye	16/10/2020	Gökay Ersel GÜLEK 1974 İstanbul Turkish	Şahin BULUT
135.	47814/20	Kurt v. Türkiye	19/10/2020	Ali KURT 1973 Sivas Turkish	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
136.	48952/20	Emeç v. Türkiye	28/08/2020	Hüseyin EMEÇ 1988 Hatay Turkish
137.	48982/20	Kanak v. Türkiye	20/10/2020	Süleyman KANAK 1976 Mersin Turkish	Burcu HAS
138.	49075/20	Toruk v. Türkiye	27/10/2020	Mevlüt TORUK 1959 Bolu Turkish	Hamdi Kenan SEVİNÇ
139.	50616/20	Akan v. Türkiye	23/10/2020	İsmail Deniz AKAN 1990 Samsun Turkish
140.	50844/20	Abanoz v. Türkiye	05/11/2020	Celal ABANOZ 1992 Trabzon Turkish	Orçun MUŞLU
141.	51010/20	Şahin v. Türkiye	02/11/2020	Seyfullah ŞAHİN 1990 Yozgat Turkish	Hülya ŞAHİN
142.	51256/20	Çelen v. Türkiye	04/11/2020	Bilal ÇELEN 1990 İstanbul Turkish	Emrullah POLAT
143.	51444/20	Oruç v. Türkiye	04/11/2020	Özkan ORUÇ 1975 İzmir Turkish	Safiye YILMAZ
144.	51510/20	Keklik v. Türkiye	05/11/2020	Ömür KEKLİK 1985 Malatya Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
145.	51814/20	Tutal v. Türkiye	09/11/2020	Cahit TUTAL 1980 Konya Turkish
146.	51915/20	Uçar v. Türkiye	17/09/2020	Fikret UÇAR 1981 Kayseri Turkish
147.	52181/20	Özsarı v. Türkiye	24/06/2020	İbrahim ÖZSARI 1992 Karabük Turkish
148.	52221/20	Duran v. Türkiye	09/11/2020	İsmet DURAN 1967 Konya Turkish	Leyla MESUTOĞLU
149.	52331/20	Kara v. Türkiye	26/10/2020	Fikret KARA 1975 Kırıkkale Turkish
150.	52597/20	Çınar v. Türkiye	16/11/2020	Kadir ÇINAR 1978 Kahramanmaraş Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
151.	52743/20	Yalçın v. Türkiye	17/11/2020	Mustafa YALÇIN 1980 Zonguldak Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
152.	52952/20	Bal v. Türkiye	21/07/2020	Ahmet BAL 1973 Konya Turkish	Mehmet ÖNCÜ
153.	53047/20	Erdoğdu v. Türkiye	27/11/2020	Necmi ERDOĞDU 1973 Adana Turkish	Safiyye Nur SABUNCU KARAKURT
154.	53162/20	İncebacak v. Türkiye	08/07/2020	Yüksel İNCEBACAK 1988 Kastamonu Turkish	Feyzullah ALTAŞ
155.	54849/20	Önce v. Türkiye	15/10/2020	Kemal ÖNCE 1978 Adana Turkish
156.	55290/20	Çiftçi v. Türkiye	30/11/2020	Turgay ÇİFTÇİ 1974 Kocaeli Turkish	Enes Malik KILIÇ
157.	55510/20	Gün v. Türkiye	24/11/2020	Ramazan GÜN 1985 Konya Turkish	Leyla MESUTOĞLU
158.	41/21	Pakır v. Türkiye	03/12/2020	Abdullah PAKIR 1971 Konya Turkish
159.	1202/21	Ciğerci v. Türkiye	18/12/2020	Zafer CİĞERCİ 1979 Kayseri Turkish
160.	1386/21	Aydemir v. Türkiye	26/11/2020	Gültekin AYDEMİR 1981 İstanbul Turkish
161.	1622/21	Atasever v. Türkiye	22/12/2020	Ramazan ATASEVER 1992 Bursa Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
162.	1916/21	Gündüz v. Türkiye	21/12/2020	İbrahim GÜNDÜZ 1984 Kocaeli Turkish	Enes Malik KILIÇ
163.	1969/21	Karaduman v. Türkiye	22/12/2020	Levent KARADUMAN 1974 İstanbul Turkish
164.	2000/21	Bat v. Türkiye	10/12/2020	Suphi BAT 1973 İstanbul Turkish
165.	2344/21	Durmaz v. Türkiye	25/12/2020	Cüneyt DURMAZ 1978 Ankara Turkish
166.	2526/21	Mirici v. Türkiye	24/12/2020	Şahin MİRİCİ 1958 Mersin Turkish
167.	3082/21	Bozkurt v. Türkiye	30/12/2020	Hüseyin BOZKURT 1989 Mersin Turkish	Adnan ZEYBEK
168.	3107/21	Tokatlı v. Türkiye	16/12/2020	Mehmet TOKATLI 1978 Ankara Turkish
169.	3196/21	Kaya v. Türkiye	08/12/2020	Hasan KAYA 1978 İstanbul Turkish
170.	3454/21	Bozkurt v. Türkiye	28/12/2020	Selçuk BOZKURT 1986 İstanbul Turkish
171.	3606/21	Kodal v. Türkiye	23/12/2020	Ahmet KODAL 1989 Ordu Turkish	Hamide Nur ALKAÇ
172.	3867/21	Gökmen v. Türkiye	30/12/2020	Bilgin GÖKMEN 1971 Ankara Turkish	Zeynep Sena GÖKMEN
173.	3891/21	Bozkurt v. Türkiye	31/12/2020	Mustafa BOZKURT 1974 İzmir Turkish	Ahmet Selim BURAK
174.	4313/21	Hacımustafaoğlu v. Türkiye	30/12/2020	Hasan HACIMUSTAFAOĞLU 1981 Bartin Turkish	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
175.	6002/21	Şahin v. Türkiye	07/01/2021	İzzet ŞAHİN 1977 Kocaeli Turkish	İrem TATLIDEDE
176.	6115/21	Yoldaş v. Türkiye	25/08/2020	Hamit YOLDAŞ Giresun Turkish
177.	7448/21	Salbaş v. Türkiye	28/01/2021	Hasan SALBAŞ 1988 Bolu Turkish	Said İsmail TÜRKOĞLU
178.	7862/21	Özcan v. Türkiye	28/01/2021	Faruk ÖZCAN 1980 Hakkari Turkish	Seyhan DEMİR
179.	8613/21	Şahin v. Türkiye	26/01/2020	Gül Ahmet ŞAHİN 1975 Ankara Turkish	Mustafa SOYLU
180.	8879/21	Buğdaylıgil v. Türkiye	02/02/2021	Himmet BUĞDAYLIGIL 1960 İzmir Turkish	Seçkin KESKİN
181.	9312/21	Kırtay v. Türkiye	09/12/2020	Cuma Gökhan KIRTAY 1991 Mersin Turkish	Abdullah KIRTAY
182.	9428/21	Çakmak v. Türkiye	21/01/2021	Dursun ÇAKMAK 1978 Konya Turkish	Şeyma ALKAN
183.	9763/21	Dal v. Türkiye	11/02/2021	Mustafa DAL 1979 İzmir Turkish	Halil ÇETİN
184.	9942/21	Ağaçdan v. Türkiye	03/12/2020	Ebubekir AĞAÇDAN 1992 Ankara Turkish	Naciye Refia ÇOKER
185.	11322/21	Çalış v. Türkiye	04/12/2020	Hamit ÇALIŞ 1973 Uşak Turkish	Burcu HAS
186.	12213/21	Canbolat v. Türkiye	11/02/2021	Hasan CANBOLAT 1971 Kayseri Turkish	Hasan Hüseyin GEZGİN
187.	12500/21	Kaya v. Türkiye	09/01/2021	Aydın KAYA 1980 Ankara Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
188.	12986/21	Orhan v. Türkiye	04/03/2021	Hüseyin ORHAN 1967 Düzce Turkish	Derya ORHAN
189.	13843/21	Çatkaya v. Türkiye	23/02/2021	Remzi ÇATKAYA 1985 Kars Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
190.	14559/21	Topcan v. Türkiye	04/03/2021	Cafer TOPCAN 1968 Aydın Turkish	Orçun MUŞLU
191.	14583/21	Genç v. Türkiye	03/03/2021	Abdullah GENÇ 1992 Kırıkkale Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
192.	14885/21	Kaya v. Türkiye	08/07/2020	Orhan KAYA 1976 Rize Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
193.	16689/21	Acar v. Türkiye	10/03/2021	İsmail ACAR 1971 Balçova Turkish
194.	18714/21	Doğan v. Türkiye	25/03/2021	Şerafettin DOĞAN 1983 İstanbul Turkish	Sümeyye Sema COŞAN
195.	19144/21	İnci v. Türkiye	01/04/2021	Ahmet İNCİ 1990 Adıyaman Turkish	Gülnihal YILMAZ
196.	21770/21	Gündoğdu v. Türkiye	05/04/2021	Mustafa GÜNDOĞDU 1980 Manisa Turkish	Fatma BABAYİĞİT
197.	22115/21	Çete v. Türkiye	16/04/2021	Mehmet ÇETE 1975 İzmir Turkish
198.	24675/21	Uyanık v. Türkiye	07/05/2021	İbrahim Emre UYANIK 1984 Bursa Turkish
199.	26131/21	Demir v. Türkiye	22/04/2021	Şinasi DEMİR 1978 Zonguldak Turkish
200.	36015/21	Yalçın v. Türkiye	02/07/2021	Rahmetullah YALÇIN 1975 Antalya Turkish	Serra YAĞMUR ERGÜÇ
201.	36762/21	Çandik v. Türkiye	07/07/2021	Yasin ÇANDİK 1976 ALTINDAG / ANKARA Turkish	Muhammed Mustafa GÜRSOY
202.	37266/21	Karakoç v. Türkiye	13/07/2021	Hasan KARAKOÇ 1973 Kırıkkale Turkish
203.	38533/21	Karapınar v. Türkiye	01/07/2021	Kürşat Turan KARAPINAR 1989 İstanbul Turkish	Emre AKARYILDIZ
204.	38710/21	Ersöyleyen v. Türkiye	24/06/2021	Zekeriya ERSÖYLEYEN 1990 Kayseri Turkish	Ayşe AYAZMA
205.	39726/21	Pehlivan v. Türkiye	04/08/2021	Zafer PEHLİVAN 1970 Kırşehir Turkish	Ayşenur Banu PEHLİVAN
206.	39745/21	Adam v. Türkiye	16/07/2021	Abdülmecit ADAM 1987 Gaziantep Turkish	Bülent Seçkin DÜZTAŞ
207.	43989/21	Baktır v. Türkiye	09/08/2021	Ahmet Beyhan BAKTIR 1988 Kayseri Turkish