Přehled

Rozhodnutí

FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 42264/21
Attila KALOCSAI against Hungary
and 9 other applications

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 22 September 2022 as a Committee composed of:

Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President,

Erik Wennerström,

Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges,

and Attila Teplan, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the abovementioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 13 October 2022.

Attila Teplan Krzysztof Wojtyczek
Acting Deputy Registrar President


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention

(excessive length of pre-trial detention)

No.

Application no.
Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Other complaints under wellestablished case-law

Date of receipt of Government’s declaration

Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

42264/21

06/08/2021

Attila KALOCSAI

1983

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - The obligatory

1-year review was carried out with a delay of 45 days.

15/08/2022

15/12/2021

4,100

45556/21

03/09/2021

Róbert ORGOVÁN

1979

Katalin ORGOVÁN

1976

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

15/08/2022

13/04/2022

3,600

54428/21

29/10/2021

Ignác TÓTH

1995

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

04/08/2022

05/04/2022

2,900

1043/22

13/12/2021

László HIRT

1970

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - The 1-year review of the applicant’s detention took place with a 3-month delay.

11/07/2022

31/05/2022

3,400

3488/22

05/01/2022

Kanu SYLVANUS

1969

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

19/07/2022

11/08/2022

3,500

3937/22

10/01/2022

Attila VARGA

1960

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

07/07/2022

15/06/2022

3,300

6893/22

25/01/2022

Tamás NAGY

2001

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - The 6-month obligatory review was carried out with a delay of 69 days.

04/07/2022

09/06/2022

4,100

7675/22

01/02/2022

Dávid RAFFAI

1987

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

19/07/2022

23/06/2022

3,100

10347/22

11/02/2022

Attila KRASZNAI

1983

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

04/07/2022

30/06/2022

3,900

10572/22

16/02/2022

Norbert VRBENSZKI

1979

Karsai Dániel András

Budapest

19/07/2022

16/08/2022

3,900


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.