Přehled

Text rozhodnutí
Datum rozhodnutí
25.8.2022
Rozhodovací formace
Významnost
3
Číslo stížnosti / sp. zn.

Rozhodnutí

FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 18225/21
Róbert ANDÓ against Hungary
and 4 other applications

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 25 August 2022 as a Committee composed of:

Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President,

Erik Wennerström,

Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges,

and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”).

The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the abovementioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 15 September 2022.

Attila Teplán Krzysztof Wojtyczek
Acting Deputy Registrar President



APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention

(excessive length of criminal proceedings)

No.

Application no.
Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Other complaints under wellestablished case-law

Date of receipt of Government’s declaration

Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

18225/21

26/03/2021

Róbert ANDÓ

1985

Tímár Mátyás Sándor

Nagykörös

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings

30/11/2021

09/05/2022

2,300

53324/21

13/10/2021

Gábor Róbert TÁPAI

1972

Bene Zoltán

Szeged

05/04/2022

07/03/2022

4,600

54447/21

25/10/2021

Attila TÓTH

1972

Kozák Andrea

Miskolc

13/05/2022

08/04/2022

3,200

60569/21

08/12/2021

János SARKADI

1987

Bene Zoltán

Szeged

03/06/2022

01/04/2022

3,200

61381/21

11/12/2021

Katalin BOLDOGNÉ ORBÁN

1975

10/05/2022

13/06/2022

1,000


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.