RUCI A OSTATNÍ proti Albánii

Přehled

Text rozhodnutí

Datum rozhodnutí

20.4.2021

Rozhodovací formace

výbor

Významnost

Číslo stížnosti / sp. zn.

56937/10

Rozhodnutí

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 56937/10
RUCI and BEJLERI against Albania
and 191 other applications
(see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 20 April 2021 as a Committee composed of:

Dmitry Dedov, President,
Darian Pavli,
Peeter Roosma, judges,
and Olga Chernishova, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended tables,

Having regard to the pilot judgment delivered in the case of Manushaqe Puto and Others v. Albania, nos. 604/07 and 3 others, 31 July 2012

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

1. A detailed list of the applicants, including their representatives and the date of introduction of each application, has been set out in the tables appended to this decision (“the Appendix”).

Background to the case

2. In 2012 the Court delivered a pilot judgment in respect of Albania finding a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention as well as of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the authorities’ prolonged non‑enforcement of final decisions awarding compensation in lieu of restitution of property expropriated by the former communist regime, and a breach of Article 13 of the Convention owing to the lack of an effective domestic remedy in that regard (see Manushaqe Puto and Others v. Albania, nos. 604/07 and 3 others, 31 July 2012).

3. Further to the implementation of the Manushaqe Puto and Others pilot judgment, on 5 December 2015 the Albanian Parliament adopted the Treatment of Property and Finalisation of the Property Compensation Process Act (“the 2015 Property Act”), which introduced a new remedy for securing the enforcement of the right to compensation. According to the new remedy, for the purpose of enforcement, all final decisions which had recognised the right to compensation, without determining the amount of compensation, would be subject to a financial evaluation. It would be carried out by the Agency for Treatment of Property (the “ATP”) which had been established by the 2015 Property Act. The ATP would determine the value of the financial evaluation on the basis of the cadastral category of the property at the time of expropriation. Property valuation maps comprising the names of administrative units, cadastral zones, cadastral category and respective price per square meter were subsequently adopted.

Unenforced final decisions which had determined the amount of compensation would be enforced in full, subject to indexation.

4. On 17 March 2020 the Court delivered a landmark decision in the case of Beshiri and Others v. Albania ((dec.), no. 29026/06 and 11 other applications), in which it found that, subject to, amongst other things, the amount of the compensation being no less than 10% of the value to which former owners would be entitled if the financial evaluation was to be carried out by reference to the current cadastral category of the expropriated property, the domestic remedy introduced by virtue of the 2015 Property Act was effective (ibid., § 196).

The circumstances of the case

5. The present applications were lodged with the Court between 2010 and 2015 and concern the prolonged non-enforcement of final decisions recognising the applicants’ right to compensation in one of the ways provided for by law in lieu of the restitution of their properties which had been expropriated by the former communist regime. They raise issues similar to those examined by the Court in the Manushaqe Puto and Others pilot judgment, cited above.

6. Details of the final decisions and enforcement thereof, which have been updated in view of the information provided by most of the applicants, have been summarily set out in the Appendix.

Relevant domestic law and practice
1. The 2015 Property Act

7. The 2015 Property Act was described in details in the Beshiri and Others decision, cited above, §§ 30-62. As stated in that decision, by way of in abstracto constitutional review, in January 2017 the Constitutional Court endorsed the new compensation scheme introduced by sections 6 (1) and (2) of the 2015 Property Act. It did not reach the required number of votes to decide on the calculation of the financial evaluation provided for in section 7 and, consequently, decided to dismiss that part of the complaint without prejudice (vendosi refuzimin e kërkesës). The operative provisions of the decision stated that the Constitutional Court decided to reject the request about repealing section 6 (1) (b) and section 7 (2) (a) and (b) (vendosi refuzimin e kërkesës për shfuqizimin e nenit 6, pika 1, shkronja “b”, si dhe të nenit 7, pika 2, shkronja “a” dhe “b”). However, it decided to strike down sections 6 (3) and (5) of the 2015 Property Act stating that (as reproduced from the Beshiri and Others decision, cited above):

“70. ... [those] provisions ‘were conceived as new expropriation since they envisaged a re-evaluation of properties that had already been restored to [former] owners or for which they had already received compensation’. It was for this reason that they gave rise to issues concerning a breach of the principle of legal certainty, especially as regards the lack of clarity and foreseeability. The Constitutional Court stated that ‘the legislator should consider the extent to which compensation in kind provided for in [the repealed] sections 6 §§ 3 and 5 is supplemented by other provisions in order to avoid any overlapping or contradiction between legal provisions’”.

8. Notwithstanding the Constitutional Court’s decision, on 7 December 2017 a fresh request for in abstracto constitutional review of sections 6 (1) (b) and 7 (2) (a) and (b) of the 2015 Property Act as well as of certain provisions of implementing decisions adopted by the Government was lodged with the Constitutional Court by an association of former owners (see, also, Beshiri and Others, cited above, §§ 73, 81 and 89).

Domestic case-law subsequent to the Court’s decision in Beshiri and Others

(a) Constitutional Court’s case-law

9. In response to the second request for the constitutional review of certain provisions of the 2015 Property Act and its implementing decisions (see paragraph 8 above), in decision no. 4 of 15 February 2021 the Constitutional Court held that, in so far as it had not examined the merits of the complaints concerning sections 6 (1) (b) and 7 (2) (a) and (b) of the 2015 Property Act and it had not taken a final decision regarding their compatibility with the constitutional provisions and the Convention in 2017, the principle of res judicata did not apply to its prior findings in respect of such complaints and, consequently, it was not prevented from examining the merits of those complaints.

10. The Constitutional Court recalled that section 6 (1) and (2) embodied the main principles of the compensation formula (otherwise referred to as the financial evaluation in the 2015 Property Act). The provision of section 6 (1) (b) was a constituent element of the compensation formula provided in section 6 and regulated the evaluation of the property which had been restored. The remaining provisions of section 6 governed other situations relating to the application of the compensation formula (that is, the financial evaluation). It therefore concluded that the repeal of sections 6 (3) and (5) did not affect the application of section 6 (1) (b) and dismissed that part of the complaint.

11. As regards section 7 (2), the Constitutional Court stated that the provisions of section 7 (2) (a) and (b) regulated instances where a former owner had obtained prior partial restoration of the expropriated property. The Constitutional Court noted that, based on updated information provided by the Government, a sizeable number of decisions, namely 10,120 out of 26,091, which had been subject to financial evaluation, were affected by a change of the cadastral category over time. Consequently, it was for the legislature - and not the executive branch of the State - to determine how the 10% minimum threshold for the amount of compensation that this Court had directed in the Beshiri and Others decision was to be applied to that category, including to cases where former owners had obtained some prior partial restoration. It was for this reason that the Constitutional Court found that the method of calculation contained in section 7 (2) (a) and (b), which had not been amended following the Court’s decision in Beshiri and Others, did not comply with the 10% minimum threshold, and concluded that the interference with the former owners’ right to property was disproportionate. It therefore decided to repeal section 7 (2) (a) and (b) of the 2015 Property Act. The Constitutional Court deferred the entry into force of its decision by six months and directed the legislature to enact new legislation, within the same period, to fill the legal vacuum in the 2015 Property Act arising from the repealed provisions.

12. The Constitutional Court further repealed certain provisions of implementing decisions adopted by the Government, since, by virtue of the 2015 Property Act, the legislature had not delegated to the Government the authority to determine a priority order of compensation forms or a combination of different compensation forms.

(b) Supreme Court’s case-law

13. From 15 May to 8 June 2020 the administrative bench of the Supreme Court delivered a number of decisions concerning applications for the stay of enforcement of domestic courts’ decisions given in cases relating to the financial evaluation carried out by the ATP, namely decisions no. 210 of 15 May 2020, no. 122/462 of 1 June 2020, nos. 45/327 and 56/348 of 8 June 2020.

14. The Supreme Court’s administrative bench held that an application for the stay of enforcement of decisions given by the Administrative Court of Appeal would be granted on the condition that, amongst others, the impugned decisions were final. In those cases, in so far as the Administrative Court of Appeal had examined actions against the ATP decisions on financial evaluation as a first-instance court and given that an appeal against the Administrative Court of Appeal decisions had been lodged with the Supreme Court and was pending before it, the application for the stay of enforcement was rejected on the ground that the Administrative Court of Appeal decisions had not become final. The Administrative Court of Appeal decisions had annulled the financial evaluation carried out by the ATP and enjoined the ATP either to carry out a fresh financial evaluation or to award the payment of a specific sum of money as financial compensation.

COMPLAINTS

15. Almost all applicants complained that there was a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, and most of the applicants complained that there was a breach of Article 13 of the Convention, on account of the authorities’ non‑enforcement of final decisions which had recognised their right to receive compensation in lieu of the restitution of properties.

THE LAW

16. The Court notes that the applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, taken alone and in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention, which, in so far as relevant, read as follows:

Article 6 – Right to a fair trial

“1. In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...”

Article 13 – Right to an effective remedy

“Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.”

Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – Protection of property

“Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.

The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties.”

Joinder of the applications

17. The Court, having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court.

The complaint under Article 13 of the Convention as well as the complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention
1. As regards decision no. 651 of 31 October 1994 in respect of application no. 24086/15, application no. 41685/15 and decisions nos. 210 of 7 July 1995 and 210 of 26 February 2008 in respect of application no. 56491/15

18. As regards decision no. 651 of 31 October 1994 given in respect of application no. 24086/15 (see row no. 15 of the Appendix), application no. 41685/15 (see row no. 43 of the Appendix), as well as decisions nos. 210 of 7 July 1995 and 210 of 26 February 2008 given in respect of application no. 56491/15 (see row no. 61 in the Appendix), the Court takes note of the applicants’ wish to withdraw their complaints. In these circumstances, the Court concludes that the applicants do not intend to pursue their complaints in respect of the concerned decisions, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, and it finds no reasons of general interest concerning respect for human rights, within the meaning of the final sentence of Article 37 § 1, which would require the continued examination of those complaints.

19. It follows that, in so far as the complaints concerning decision no. 651 of 31 October 1994 given in respect of application no. 24086/15, decisions nos. 210 of 7 July 1995 and 210 of 26 February 2008 given in respect of application no. 56491/15 are concerned, that part of the application should be struck out of the Court’s list of cases. As regards application no. 41685/15, it should be struck out of the Court’s list of cases.

As regards the remainder of the applications

20. At the outset, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine the legal standing of the applicants or heirs, their shares of inherited properties or their right to compensation or any factual discrepancies in respect of domestic decisions, as the applications are in any event inadmissible for the following reasons.

21. The Court recalls that, as a part of implementation of the Manushaqe Puto and Others pilot judgment, the authorities introduced a domestic remedy by adopting the 2015 Property Act (see paragraph 3 above). The Court examined this domestic remedy in the Beshiri and Others decision and found that, on the basis of the available information at the material time, that remedy was effective, within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention (see paragraph 4 above).

22. The Court notes that, subsequent to the delivery of the Beshiri and Others decision, on 15 February 2021 the Constitutional Court delivered a decision in response to another request for in abstracto constitutional review of certain provisions of the 2015 Property Act, repealing its section 7 (2) (a) and (b) and certain provisions of implementing decisions. The Court considers that the Constitutional Court’s findings do not warrant a departure from its findings that the new compensation remedy still remains an effective remedy, within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention, for the reasons given below.

23. The Court notes that the Constitutional Court reconfirmed the core features of the compensation scheme, as stated in section 6 of the 2015 Property Act. It did not question the reference to the original cadastral category of the expropriated property as the main basis for carrying out the financial evaluation.

24. The Court is satisfied that, in deciding to repeal section 7 (2) (a) and (b) of the 2015 Property Act which regulated the determination of financial evaluation when a former owner had obtained prior partial restoration of the expropriated property, the Constitutional Court acted consistently with and, indeed, sought to give effect to the Court’s direction that the amount of compensation should not be less than 10% of the value to which former owners would be entitled if the financial evaluation was carried out by reference to the current cadastral category of the expropriated property (see Beshiri and Others, cited above, § 196). Furthermore, the Constitutional Court directed the legislature to replace the repealed provisions within a period of six months.

25. The Court does not consider that the repeal of applicable provisions in the implementing decisions adopted by the Government raises any novel issues. It has already stated in the Beshiri and Others decision, amongst other things, that it was not its task “to determine the hierarchy of compensation forms to be awarded by the domestic authorities”, and that the domestic legal framework “ought to describe and circumscribe with sufficient clarity the exercise of discretion by the ATP - or other implementing authorities - in making decisions relating to the award of compensation” (ibid., §§ 179 and 180). The Court further recalls that, in view of the considerable burden on the State budget which financial compensation represented, it urged the respondent State in the Manushaqe Puto and Others pilot judgment, “as a matter of priority, to start making use of other alternative forms of compensation, which would eventually ease pressure on the budget, and/or to introduce other methods of compensation” (ibid., § 113).

26. The Court finds that, in view of the reasons described above, namely the reconfirmation of the main features of the compensation scheme, the endorsement of the amount of compensation to be awarded to former owners in line with the direction made in the Beshiri and Others decision and the statutory stipulation for various forms of compensation, no issues affect the effectiveness of the remedy provided for by the 2015 Property Act as such, which continues to remain accessible and efficient to all former owners and provides for an appropriate form of redress. The deferred entry into force of the Constitutional Court’s decision will allow the authorities, in particular the legislature, to pass legislation which would ensure compliance with the Court’s Beshiri and Others decision and maintain the effectiveness of the remedy provided for by the 2015 Property Act. The Court therefore considers that the applicants’ complaint under Article 13 of the Convention (see paragraph 15 above) is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention (see, also, Beshiri and Others, cited above, § 221).

27. As regards the applicants’ remaining complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see paragraph 15 above), the Court observes that, depending on the actual stage of the proceedings in respect of each application, the following situations can be distinguished.

28. In the first place, as regards decision no. 110 of 29 June 1995 given in respect of application no. 30046/15 (see row no. 29 of the Appendix), no. 241 of 12 September 1995 given in respect of application 161/17 (see row no. 121 of the Appendix), no. 67 of 6 April 2006 given in respect of application no. 35959/17 (see row no. 126 of the Appendix), as well as all applications described in Table 2 (rows nos. 157-92 of the Appendix), the Court observes that the domestic proceedings concerning the determination of the compensation amount are pending before the national courts. It considers therefore that it would be premature for it to deal with these complaints, which must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention (see Beshiri and Others, cited above, § 219). The subsequent Supreme Court’s case-law further confirms that, where an appeal has been filed with the highest court, the lower courts’ decisions would become final and enforceable upon the delivery of a decision by the Supreme Court (see paragraphs 13 and 14 above).

29. Secondly, the Court notes that, in so far as application nos. 43859/13 and 18669/16 are concerned (see rows nos. 5 and 97 of the Appendix), the domestic authorities did not recognise by means of a final decision the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of which it cannot be said that they have a “legitimate expectation” to receive compensation, and thus a “possession” for the purposes of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 49, ECHR 2004‑IX; and Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 39794/98, § 73, ECHR 2002‑VII). As regards application no. 18669/16, the applicants have not provided any updated information that they have lodged a fresh property claim in accordance with the 2015 Property Act seeking the recognition of their right to compensation. It follows that the complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 is incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. Consequently, the complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of such domestic decisions is manifestly ill‑founded and should be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

30. Thirdly, in so far as the applicants in applications nos. 11666/20 and 22859/20 (see rows nos. 186 and 155 of the Appendix) claimed that the court decisions acknowledging the existence of a legal fact gave rise to a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the Court considers that this complaint is incompatible ratione materiae within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 as those court decisions did not confer on the applicants property rights or any other rights whatsoever (see Bici v. Albania, no. 5250/07, §§ 46-52, 3 December 2015, and, mutatis mutandis, Marku v. Albania, no. 54710/12, § 37, 15 July 2014). This complaint must thus be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. Consequently, any complaint about the non-enforcement of such domestic decisions brought under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention is manifestly ill-founded and should be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

31. Lastly, the Court finds that, regardless of the applications’ date of introduction, the remaining applications found in the Appendix, save for specific individual decisions given in respect of the applications which have been examined separately in paragraphs 18-19 and 28-30 above, were or are required under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention to avail themselves of the new domestic remedy introduced by virtue of the 2015 Property Act in compliance with the relevant domestic rules. The applicants have either failed to exhaust domestic remedies or failed to inform the Court of any action they have taken in this regard. This equally applies to those cases in which the ATP did not carry out a financial evaluation due to the lack of required documentation or on account of other reasons, or to those cases in which the ATP decided that the applicants were deemed to have been fully compensated, in respect of which the applicants were similarly required to follow the relevant domestic procedures. The Court finds no exceptional circumstances capable of exempting the applicants from the obligation to exhaust domestic remedies (see Beshiri and Others, cited above, §§ 216‑18). It follows that these complaints must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.

32. Notwithstanding the above conclusion, the Court recalls the stipulations made in paragraph 222 of the decision Beshiri and Others, cited above, regarding the conditions which the authorities ought to satisfy in order for the remedy to continue to remain effective, in particular the award of compensation of no less than 10% of the value to which former owners would be entitled if the financial evaluation was carried out by reference to the current cadastral category of the expropriated property.

Other alleged violations of the Convention

33. In so far as the applicants in application no. 18669/16 (see row no. 97 of the Appendix) appear to complain about an alleged unfairness of domestic court proceedings, the Court notes that, on the basis of the material in the case file, the last domestic decision was given by the Supreme Court on 26 February 2013, more than six months before the date of the introduction of the application on 31 March 2016. It follows that this complaint under Article 6 § 1 is out of time and must be declared inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention.

34. Having regard to all the material in its possession, and in so far as the complaints fall within its competence, the Court finds that the complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the alleged unfairness of domestic court proceedings in respect of applications nos. 7645/16, 9833/16 and 14390/16 (see rows nos. 86, 89 and 95) and the complaints under Article 14 of the Convention in respect of applications nos. 21990/16, 24962/16, 27133/17 and 32114/17 (see rows nos. 98, 172, 177 and 178 of the Appendix) do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that this part of the application must be rejected as manifestly ill founded, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike out of its list of cases the complaints concerning decision no. 651 of 31 October 1994 given in respect of application no. 24086/15, decisions nos. 210 of 7 July 1995 and 210 of 26 February 2008 given in respect of application no. 56491/15, and application no. 41685/15;

Declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 3 June 2021.

{signature_p_1} {signature_p_2}

{ Olga Chernishova Dmitry Dedov
Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Table 1

No.	Application no. Date of introduction	Applicant’s name	Article	Description of final domestic decisions	Enforcement details	Represented by
1.	56937/10 Lodged on 21/07/2010	Gani RUÇI Fazilete BEJLERI (née RUÇI)	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1007 of 21 April 2003 the Gjirokastër Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 40,000 sq. m which would be compensated by means of State bonds in the amount of 976,000 Albanian leks (“ALL” – approx. 7,776 euros “EUR”).	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Artan Hajdari
2.	60985/12 Lodged on 17/09/2012	Zamira MARKU	Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 742 of 4 March 1996 the Tirana Commission, supplementing its decision no. 400 of 2 October 1995, recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 69,400 sq. m, of which 5,000 sq. m which was occupied by unlawfully constructed buildings were restored, 5,000 sq. m would be compensated in kind and the remaining 59,400 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Spiro Dodbiba
3.	80562/12 Lodged on 28/11/2012	Ismail REKA Tahire DAJA[1] Lirije LACEJ Njazi REKA Arben BARONI Zana HARXHI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1557 of 30 September 2003 the Supreme Court, modifying the Tirana Commission decision no. 549 of 3 May 1996, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 6,870 sq. m.	The Agency for Treatment of Property (“ATP”) has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants have not taken any action concerning the enforcement of the ATP’s decision on the financial evaluation.	Viktor Gumi
4.	80606/12 Lodged on 28/11/2012	Mustafa VOKOPOLA Fatbardha VOKOPOLA Ferit VOKOPOLA Neire VOKOPOLA Nafize VOKOPOLA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 856 of 20 September 2008 the Fier Agency, which had replaced the Commission, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 97,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Artur Hajdari
5.	43859/13 Lodged on 01/07/2013	Ibrahim DAKLI Endri KOTHERJA Ruzhdije DAKLI Drita DAKLI Sami DAKLI Shpresa DAKLI Valentina DAKLI Besa DAKLI Bardhul DAKLI Lauresha DAKLI Elona DAKLI Rukiela DAKLI Artan KURTI Silvana DRACINI Mirela DRACINI Minerva KOTHERJA Hysni KOTHERJA Hyqmet KOTHERJA[2] Pranvera KARAPICI Zana SHAMI Sabire GABECI Engjell DAKLI Arjana DAKLI Naim DAKLI Nexhmije DAKLI Suljan DAKLI Eris DAKLI Lulezim DAKLI Arben DAKLI Burbuqe KOTHERJA Drita DAKLI	Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 135/6 of 9 February 1996 the Elbasan Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 40,940 sq. m, of which 17,979 were restored (2,215 sq. m having been restored by means of two prior decisions given in 1994 and 1995), no right to compensation having been recognised in respect of the remaining 20,746 sq. m. Following a civil action concerning the recognition of the applicants’ right to compensation, on 23 September 2010 the Tirana Court of Appeal accepted the civil action and ordered the Property Agency, which had by that time replaced the Commission, to decide on the applicants’ right to financial compensation in respect of 20,746 sq. m. No decision having been taken by the Property Agency, in November 2012 the applicants lodged a constitutional complaint alleging a breach of their right of access to court on account of the non-enforcement of the Tirana Court of Appeal decision. On 19 February 2013 the Constitutional Court held that “the Property Agency’s obligation to take a decision, in implementation of the Tirana Court of Appeal decision, constitutes a formal aspect of the process and not a final decision relating to the right to compensation. Consequently, the failure to adopt such a decision does not prevent the applicants from seeking the substantial right to compensation, by applying and submitting the required documents, as prescribed by the relevant legal framework”. It thus found no breach of the right of access to court as the applicants had failed to seek compensation. In October 2015 the applicants lodged another civil action seeking an amendment to the operative provisions of the Elbasan Commission decision to the effect that they were to be awarded compensation. On 31 May 2018 the Durrës Court of Appeal decided that the applicants should be compensated in respect of 20,746 sq. m, which was occupied, in accordance with the law. A cassation appeal is pending before the Supreme Court.	In the absence of a final recognition of the right to compensation, the applicants have not applied for the award of compensation.	Endri KOTHERJA
6.	67691/14 Lodged on 08/10/2014	Samedin KURTI Teuta XHEMALCE (née KURTI) Agron KURTI[3] Ylvi KURTI Shpëtim KURTI Fatbardha VRAPI (née KURTI)	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 141 of 20 February 2009 the Lushnja District Court, modifying the Lushnja Commission decision no. 14 of 10 February 1995, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 16,000 sq. m, of which 4,769.75 was restored and the remaining 11,230.25 sq. m would be compensated.	The ATP, following the financial evaluation of the decision, decided that the applicants were deemed to have been compensated.	Sokol Puto
7.	10739/15 Lodged on 23/02/2015	Tomorr QOSJA Besim QOSJA Haxhire GARUNJA Luiza DOSTI Ilirjan QOSJA Myzejen ZINXHIRIJA Fatime DURO Ismete KRASNIQI Bedrije MATUSHI Qemal KRASNIQI Xhevahir KRASNIQI Feridan KRASNIQI Brikena KRASNIQI Marsida KRASNIQI Brunela TREBICKA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 38 of 21 March 2006 the Elbasan Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 10,560 sq. m, of which 1,332 sq. m were restored and the remaining 9,228 sq. m would be compensated.	The ATP, following the financial evaluation of the decision, decided that the applicants were deemed to have been compensated.	Sokol Puto
8.	11526/15 Lodged on 03/02/2015	Artan BARE Thimo BARE Dhimiter BARE Nikolina MUSTAFAJ Marjana HYSENBEGASI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 34 of 10 February 2007 the Vlora Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 22,800 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Artan Hajdari
8.	11526/15 Lodged on 03/02/2015			By decision no. 35 of 10 July 2007 the Vlora Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 2,400 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.		Artan Hajdari
9.	11528/15 Lodged on 03/02/2015	Ahmet SHEHU Ballkeze MEHMETI Ahmet SHEHU Hedije ZEKA Afërdita SHEHU Lutfije SHEHU Marije SHEHU Elis SHEHU Aida SHEHU Xhynejd SHEHU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 437 of 22 April 1996 the Berat Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,322 sq. m which would be compensated in kind or in State bonds.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Isuf Haxhiu
				By decision no. 577 of 1 October 1996 the Berat Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 582 sq. m which would be compensated in kind or in State bonds.
				By decision no. 294 of 19 April 2002 the Berat District Court, amending the Berat Commission decision no. 12 of 30 March 1999, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 905 sq. m which would be compensated in the amount of ALL 57,672,280 (approx. EUR 459,453).
10.	11541/15 Lodged on 03/02/2015	Agron KALLAJXHI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1203 of 28 February 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 910 sq. m, of which 630 sq. m were restored, 130 sq. m would be compensated and 150 sq. m that were occupied by buildings would be compensated in kind.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Artan Hajdari
11.	13206/15 Lodged on 13/03/2015	Vladimir SHURAJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 149 of 1 June 1999 the Përmet Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 580 sq. m, of which 198 sq. m were restored and 382 sq. m would be compensated in kind.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Oltion Toro
12.	16525/15 Lodged on 31/03/2015	Tomor KOKOMANI Lumturie DUDI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 353 of 17 December 2007 the Durrës Agency restored the applicants 5,826 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 63,843 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Suela Mëneri
12.	16525/15 Lodged on 31/03/2015	Tomor KOKOMANI Lumturie DUDI		By decision no. 646 of 20 February 2002 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 12,666 sq. m		Suela Mëneri
13.	20826/15 Lodged on 25/04/2015	Luan MUMAJESI Isuf MUMAJESI Besnik MUMAJESI Petrit MUMAJESI Arben MUMAJESI Majlinda MUMAJESI Fatbardha MUMAJESI (née IDRIZI) Pullumb MUMAJESI Enver MUMAJESI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 159 of 20 July 2007 the Property Agency, modifying the Tirana Commission decision no. 409 of 4 August 2006, restored the applicants 1,820 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 49,770 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Avenir Peka
14.	20833/15 Lodged on 15/04/2015	Margarita HANXHARI Aferdita ADAMI (HANXHARI) Laura GJOKA (HANXHARI) Athanas HANXHARI Vasilika LUSHI Silvana CIKO Jordana KOJA - VOLK	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 574 of 22 May 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 2,586 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. In 2006 the applicants received financial compensation in respect of 200 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Avenir Peka Xhevdet Sheta
15.	24086/15 Lodged on 14/05/2015	Siri BESHIRI Ilmije HAMZARAJ Anil DIZDARI Alkion DIZDARI Daniele BESHIRI Patrizia BESHIRI Cristina BESHIRI	Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 651 of 31 October 1994 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 10,755 sq. m, of which 3,200 sq. m were restored and 7,555 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have expressed their wish to withdraw their complaints in respect of this decision.	Sokol PUTO
15.	24086/15 Lodged on 14/05/2015		Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 166 of 10 July 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 159,798 sq. m, of which 120,086 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Sokol PUTO
16.	24091/15 Lodged on 14/05/2015	Skender KËRÇIKU Silvana TAFILICA Ismete KËRÇIKU Ingrid LIKA Alban KËRÇIKU Saimir KËRÇIKU Adrian KËRÇIKU Lejla POJANI Naim KËRÇIKU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 197 of 21 April 2000 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decision no. 302 of 29 March 1996, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 320,000 sq. m, of which 19,732 sq. m were restored and the remaining 300,268 sq. m would be compensated by means of State bonds in the amount of ALL 1,068,264 (approx. EUR 8,497).	The ATP, following the financial evaluation of each decision, decided that the applicants were deemed to have been compensated.	Sokol Puto
17.	25427/15 Lodged on 20/05/2015	Milena NISHKU Rozeta XHAGJIKA Irena ÇELA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 616 of 9 May 2001 the Durrës District Court, modifying the Durrës Commission decision no. 469/2 of 9 February 1995, restored the applicants 152 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 3,952 sq. m. It further ordered a third party to vacate the plot measuring 152 sq. m. On 10 December 2002 the Supreme Court upheld the Durrës District Court decision.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Suela Mëneri
17.	25427/15 Lodged on 20/05/2015	Milena NISHKU Rozeta XHAGJIKA Irena ÇELA		By decision no. 132 of 5 May 2003 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 140,000 sq. m which would be compensated in State bonds in the amount of ALL 341,600 (approx. EUR 2,723).		Suela Mëneri
18.	26340/15 Lodged on 22/05/2015	Gazmend HASEKIU Manushaqe BEJTJA Nimete TURHANI Engjellushe BUMCI Fatbardha VARDARI Mahmut XHANI Ajla SHISHMANI Arben XHANI Ibrahim HASEKIU Ardjan HASEKIU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1425 of 20 September 2005 the Elbasan District Court, modifying the Elbasan Commission decision no. 166/2 of 9 March 1994, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 10,500 sq. m, of which 7, 197 sq. m were restored and the remaining 3,303 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	It would appear that the ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Altin Turhani
19.	27960/15 Lodged on 05/06/2015	Elizana NISHKU Milena NISHKU Andi NISHKU Genti NISHKU Kostandin NISHKU Ilir NISHKU Artan NISHKU Pavel NISHKU Galina PAPA Pranvera XHOXHI Gjergji ÇAUSHI Darina RESULI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 128 of 15 July 1995 the Tirana Property Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 916 sq. m, of which 804 sq. m were restored and the remaining 112 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Suela Mëneri
19.	27960/15 Lodged on 05/06/2015			By decision no. 609 of 13 May 2005 the Tirana Court of Appeal, modifying the Commission decision no. 354 of 1 December 1995, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 13,310 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.		Suela Mëneri
20.	28425/15 Lodged on 05/06/2015	Elizana NISHKU Meri HOXHA Afërdita SALLABANDA Milena NISHKU Andi NISHKU Genti NISHKU Kostandin NISHKU Ilir NISHKU Artan NISHKU Pavel NISHKU Galina PAPA Pranvera XHOXHI Gjergji CAUSHI Darina RESULI Virgjil SALLABANDA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 682 of 27 August 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 3,103.2 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Suela Mëneri
21.	28461/15 Lodged on 05/06/2015	Iliriana TIRANA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 457 of 31 May 1994 the Shkodra Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 410 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Suela Mëneri
22.	28791/15 Lodged on 10/06/2015	Afërdita SARAÇI Luljana LLAGAMI[4] Dhurata RECI Betina XHEPA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 199 of 25 April 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 2,000 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Suela Mëneri
				By decision no. 329 of 8 September 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 4,000 sq. m, of which 973 sq. m were restored and the remaining 3,027 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.
				By decision no. 476 of 11 February 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 9,525 sq. m, of which 3,248 sq. m were restored and the remaining 6,277 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.
				By decision no. 298 of 6 September 2000 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 25,000 sq. m, of which 9,412 sq. m were restored and the remaining 15,588 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.
23.	28805/15 Lodged on 11/06/2015	Bilal HYSI Myzejen EREBARA Fahrije HYSI Shresa MEZINI Venera SATA Engjellushe EREBARA Raimonda MULLA Sotir BACE Amdie BESHIRI Ardian HYSI Gjylso HYSI Seit HYSI Bitincka ADMIR Engjellushe DILKO Astrit DILKO Ferdinand DILKO Zhaneta DEMIRI Edmond XHIHANI Sali MINAROLLI Isuf XHIHANI Muhamet XHIHANI Behije TOPULLI Mirela SEKUJ Fatbardha HYSI Bardhyl HYSI Riemer VALBONA Ferdi XHIHANI Artan HYSI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 62 of 11 April 2007 the Korça Agency recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 1,222,450 sq. m.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Viktor Gumi
24.	29219/15 Lodged on 12/06/2015	Sanie DAJA (ALLA)	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 416 of 26 January 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 10,000 sq. m, of which 8,350 sq. m were restored and the remaining 1,650 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Flamur Gashi
25.	29615/15 Lodged on 15/06/2015	Bujar QIRAXHI Shresa MEZINI Myzejen QIRAXHI Greta HODO Lorenc QIRAXHI Lida QIRAXHI Kserdi QIRAXHI Ediola CIFLIGU Isida JORGJI Silvana BARDHI Valbona CELA Artan CELA Liri IDRISLLARI Florika HOXHA Majlinda QIRAXHI Emirjeta QIRAXHI Asim QIRAXHI Dashmir QIRAXHI Elza CANO Latife QIRAXHI Reshide HYSI Ilirjan QIRAXHI Fatbardha MINAROLLI Admir BITINCKA Raimonda MULLA Skender MEKA Sotir BACE Amdie BESHIRI Shpresa MEKA Aurela MEKA Altin MEKA Qamil MEKA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 231 of 26 October 2007 the Korça Agency restored the applicants a plot measuring 15,675 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 82,000 sq. m.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Viktor Gumi
26.	29733/15 Lodged on 07/08/2015	Shpëtim ALIMEHMETI Vjollca KRUTANI Lirie PLANGARICA Lejla LLAGAMI Erion ALIMEHMETI Hava ALIMEHMETI Floralda ALIMEHMETI Mereme LUGA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By its decision no. 2057 of 29 May 1997 the Tirana District Court, modifying the Tirana Commission decision no. 195 of 28 December 1993, restored the applicants a plot measuring 1,034 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 4,273 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
27.	29734/15 Lodged on 07/08/2015			By decision no. 1231 of 25 February 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 18,850 sq. m, of which 4,920 sq. m were restored and the remaining 13,930 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 4,540 sq. m in the event of privatisation.
28.	29735/15 Lodged on 07/08/2015			By decision no. 241 of 30 August 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 389.4 sq. m, of which 31.4 sq. m were restored and the remaining 358 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.
29.	30046/15 Lodged on 17/06/2015	Sabaudin BOGDANI Dashurie BOGDANI Lirie BALLVORA Mejte PUPE Rakip BOGDANI Shpresa XAMA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 110 of 29 June 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 12,000 sq. m, of which 3,486 sq. m were restored and the remaining 8,514 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings found on the area to be compensated.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Administrative Court of Appeal.	Suela MENERI
29.	30046/15 Lodged on 17/06/2015			By decision no. 613 of 14 June 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 5,400 sq. m, of which 265 sq. m were restored and the remaining 5,135 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	There is no information concerning the ATP’s financial evaluation of the decision.	Suela MENERI
30.	30358/15 Lodged on 15/06/2015	Filip RROCO	Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 320 of 16 November 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 1,195.59 sq. m, of which 1,145.59 sq. m were restored and the remaining 50 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of any decision.	Ulusi Bici
31.	32865/15 Lodged on 14/09/2015	Dritan MULLA Shkëlqim JAHJ Haxhi MULLA Besnike MULLA Loreta ZANI (née MULLA) Silvana TELI (née MULLA) Rufo MULLA Anita SHAMO (née MULLA) Arben MULLA Ilirjan MULLA Flamur MULLA Merita RRUDHA (née BUZI) Artan BUZI Hajdar BUZI Fetije MULLA Alketa MULLA Aristotel KOLA Alma MAHA (née MULLA) Dojna OSMANI (née BUZI)	Articles 6 § 1, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 194 of 30 December 1996 the Saranda Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 7,200 sq. m, of which 5,058 sq. m were restored and the remaining 2,142 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
32.	34631/15 Lodged on 13/07/2015	Agim KASMI Ibrahim JAHJAGA Naim KASMI Bedrije KASHARI Nadire JAHJA Bledi KASMI Nezihat KASMI Ardi KASMI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1 of 20 April 2007 the Durrës Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 160,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Adi Brovina
33.	35884/15 Lodged on 16/07/2015	Andis TIRANA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 243 of 3 March 1995 the Kavaja Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 2,650 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of any decision.	Suela Mëneri
				By decision no. 58 of 1 October 1999 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 10,500 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 4,594 sq. m within the area to be compensated in the event of privatisation.
				By decision no. 369 of 6 October 2000 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 6,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of a building occupying 23 sq. m in the event of privatisation and the right to joint ownership of 498 sq. m.
				By decision no. 383 of 16 October 2000 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 36,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.
34.	36213/15 Lodged on 10/07/2015	Fatbardha TIRANA Gent TIRANA Dora TIRANA Maja ADAMI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application, which is the same as application no. 28461/15 the details of which have been described in row no. 21 above, was lodged by other heirs.	Please see the details given in respect of application no. 28461/15 (row no. 21 above).	Suela Mëneri
35.	36352/15 Lodged on 29/07/2015	Zinete CELA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 539 of 22 December 1999 the Pogradec District Court, modifying the Pogradec Commission decision no. 198 of 16 January 1994, recognised the applicant’s right to compensation by means of State bonds in respect of 1,697 sq. m.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Baftjar Rusi
36.	37678/15 Lodged on 23/09/2015	Kujtim KËLLEZI Bujar PETRELA Myrshit VORPSI Liljana BULKU (née VORPSI) Suzana XHOMO (née KËLLEZI) Hatixhe KËLLEZI Albert KAZIU Enki KAZIU Klajdi KAZIU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 184 of 18 July 2006 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 840,560 sq. m, of which 276,500 sq. m were restored and the remaining 564,060 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
37.	37683/15 Lodged on 23/09/2015	Bujar PETRELA Kujtim KËLLEZI Myrshit VORPSI Liljana BULKU (née VORPSI) Suzana XHOMO (née KËLLEZI) Hatixhe KËLLEZI Albert KAZIU Enki KAZIU Klajdi KAZIU Fiqrete PETRELA Elvana DOBROLISHTI (née PETRELA) Razije PETRELA Anila PETRELA Genti PETRELA Enis SPAHIU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 600 of 21 June 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 217.2 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
38.	37685/15 Lodged on 23/09/2015			By decision no. 64/2 of 15 December 2005 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decisions no. 1091 of 28 December 1994 and no. 407 of 6 November 2000, restored the applicants 21,440 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 53,294 sq. m.
39.	37696/15 Lodged on 23/09/2015			By decision no. 64 of 15 December 2005 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decisions no. 1090 of 28 December 1994 and no. 407 of 6 November 2001, restored the applicants 2,842 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 3,628 sq. m.
40.	38827/15 Lodged on 23/09/2015	Gëzim LUGA Sanije HYSKAJ Hysen TEPELENA Hysen LUGA Jusuf FANI Dilaver TEPELENA Arben KALACI Hajrije NALLBANI Arnela LILA Lauresha KAPIDANI Mirvana KADIU Mehriban LUGA Edlira LUGA Gentian LUGA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 699 of 2 September 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 425 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. In 2005 the applicants received financial compensation in respect of 200 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Ledio Milkani
41.	40795/15 Lodged on 07/08/2015	Vehip ARAPI Jetmira ARAPI Irfan ARAPI Lavdije ARAPI Julinda ARAPI Ismete ARAPI Zeqine ARAPI Indrit ARAPI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 2007 of 3 December 2004 the Supreme Court, modifying the Lushnja Commission decision no. 106 of 3 October 1994, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 165,000 sq. m, of which 5,000 sq. m were restored and the remaining 160,000 sq. m would be compensated in State bonds.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Genti Shani
42.	40841/15 Lodged on 12/10/2015	Arben CANI Emin SHIJAKU Haxhi CANI Merita TOSKA Ilirian CANI Ismail MURTHI Albana THODHORI Enrieta VOZGA Fatlinda STRUGA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 405 of 20 September 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 7,734 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
43.	41685/15 Lodged on 15/08/2015	Petrit KETA Luan KETA Shqipe KULA Afërdita KARABOLLI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 331 of 1 November 2007 the Durrës Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 150,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	Following the financial evaluation of each decision by the ATP, the applicants have acceded to the accelerated payment scheme, as provided for in the 2015 Property Act, and have expressed their wish to withdraw the application.	Sokol Puto
				By decision no. 369 of 26 December 2007 the Durrës Agency, modifying the Commission decision no. 49 of 9 March 1995, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 7,138.8 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 25 of 30 April 2008 the Durrës Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 10,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
44.	41692/15 Lodged on 15/08/2015	Vjollca ALIKAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 617 of 12 August 1994 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 3,516 sq. m, of which 900 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP, following the financial evaluation of each decision, decided that the applicant was deemed to have been compensated.	Sokol Puto
44.	41692/15 Lodged on 15/08/2015	Vjollca ALIKAJ		By decision no. 359 of 27 September 2000 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decision no. 352 of 1 December 1995, recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 3,856 sq. m, of which 633 sq. m were restored and the remaining 3,223 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.		Sokol Puto
45.	42528/15 Lodged on 19/08/2015	Nuri XHEPA Raimonda KASMI Ismet XHEPA Rezar XHEPA Aida MEÇA Iliriana BASHA Luan STRINGA Makbule BALA Xhemal XHEPA Zenepe ZALLA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 279/10 of 5 June 1996 the Elbasan Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 4,340 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of the financial evaluation.	Kristaq Traja
				By decision no. 279/6 of 30 August 1996 the Elbasan Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 300 sq. m, of which 54 sq. m were restored and the remaining 246 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 279/8 of 20 September 1996 the Elbasan Commission recognised, amongst others, the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 72 sq. m.
				By decision no. 1335 of 6 December 1999 the Elbasan District Court, modifying the Elbasan Commission decision no. 279/4 of 24 November 1995, restored the applicants a plot measuring 2,358 sq. m. By decision no. 279/12 of 2 October 1996 the Elbasan Commission, supplementing its decision no. 279/4 of 24 November 1995, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 4,200 sq. m.
46.	42545/15 Lodged on 22/08/2015	Xhafer AGARAJ Kastriot MANCE Naim MANCE Kristi MANCE Fatbardha MANCE Heroine MANCE Adriana METALI Agron MANCE Irini VILA Nuri METE Xhevdet METE Luiza KREKA Rushit FAMA Edije XHOMAQI Marie KRISTO Eglantina RUMI Ramije BACELLARI Shpresa KAJO Luiza TOTOJANI Juljan FAMA Anila AGARAJ Ariadna THANO Edlira BANO Elona AGARAJ Sadete AGARAJ Naxhije ZHITI Dorjan ZHITI Beko CIFLIGU Sheriban FRAKULLI Pranvera LUZI Ilirjan ZHITI Dezdemona TARTARI Arberesha SHULLA Shkendije MUSABELLI Drite LENJA Gurije BALLIU Flutur BEGAJ Qendrime AGOLLI Albana GJURA Kimete CALLEKU Violeta FRAKULLI Bardhyl LENJA Shpëtim ZHITI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 56 of 11 July 2007 the Berat Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 59,500 sq. m, of which 4,150 sq. m were restored and the remaining 55,350 sq. m would be compensated.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Suela Mëneri
46.	42545/15 Lodged on 22/08/2015			By decision no. 1198 of 5 September 2013 the Berat Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 33,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.		Suela Mëneri
47.	43479/15 Lodged on 28/08/2015	Fatbardha QOSJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 63 of 29 May 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 410 sq. m, of which 24 sq. m were restored and the remaining 386 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 120 sq. m in the event of privatisation.	It would appear that the ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Rezarta Mëneri
48.	44634/15 Lodged on 07/09/2015	Xhemali HANI Fatime DAPI Kane GEGA Shaban GEGA Shyqyri KRUJA Hajrie NDREÇKA Naim KRUJA Petrit ISMAILI Rezart ISMAILI Enis ISMAILI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 91 of 30 June 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 1,452 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Viktor Gumi
49.	46095/15 Lodged on 11/09/2015	Sadete BAJRAKTARI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 861 of 18 November 1994 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 762.56 sq. m, of which 448.3 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised her right to first refusal of certain buildings.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Dorant Ekmekciu
				By decision no. 283 of 13 October 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 1,239 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 449 of 19 February 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 396.5 sq. m, of which 18 sq. m were restored and the remaining 378.5 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 188 of 31 July 1996 the Kavaja Commission recognised the applicant’s right to compensation in respect of 5,000 sq. m.
50.	46126/15 Lodged on 09/09/2015	Odin LIBOHOVA Mimoza LIBOHOVA Silven LIBOHOVA Erval LIBOHOVA Seres TURKU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 27 of 14 February 2008 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 4,232.97 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Andrea Saccucci
51.	46139/15 Lodged on 09/09/2015	Odin LIBOHOVA Mimoza LIBOHOVA Silven LIBOHOVA Erval LIBOHOVA Seres TURKU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 134 of 12 June 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 5,019 sq. m, of which 2,593 sq. m were restored and the remaining 2,426 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Andrea Saccucci
52.	46873/15 Lodged on 16/09/2015	Leka II ZOGU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 244 of 20 August 2008 the Property Agency, modifying the Tirana Commission decision no. 396 of 31 July 2006, recognised the applicant’s right to compensation in respect of 16,577 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Andrea Saccucci
53.	50767/15 Lodged on 06/10/2015	Arjan GJELI Fitnet TAMBURI Vjollca GJELI Agim PUSTINA Manjola GJELI Aida KURANI Mirvjena GJELI lma MATI Enis GJELI Fiqerete GJELI Eva GJELI Gert GJELI Bukurie SHKUPI (née PUSTINA) Rebeka DOLLANI (née PUSTINA) Rozana HOXHAJ (née PUSTINA) Sulejman SHEMSIU Fatos SHEMSIU Xheladin GJELI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 394 of 31 July 2006 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decisions no. 125 of 26 June 1995 and no. 10 of 28 December 2001, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 146,000 sq. m, of which 22,255.3 sq. m were restored and the remaining 123,744.7 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision. In 2020, further to the exercise of the right to first refusal, the applicants became the owners of a few buildings.	Sprio Dodbiba
54.	50841/15 Lodged on 06/10/2015			By decision no. 10 of 28 December 2001 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decision no. 126 of 26 June 1995, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 200,000 sq. m, of which 18,500 sq. m were restored and the remaining 181,500 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.		Sprio Dodbiba
55.	50963/15 Lodged on 10/10/2015	Renato SHEHU Qerime SHEHU Ahmet SHEHU Genci SHEHU Leonora BAJRAMI Irena ORDOLLI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 64 of 25 January 1995 the Vlora Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 2,240 sq. m.	The ATP, following the financial evaluation of the decision, decided that the applicants were deemed to have been compensated.	Sokol Puto
56.	51260/15 Lodged on 09/10/2015	Nikoll PERLESI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 207 of 27 December 1996 the Mirdita Commission recognised the applicant’s right to compensation in kind or by means of State bonds in the amount of ALL 37,520 (approx. EUR 299).	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Aleksander Perlesi
57.	53112/15 Lodged on 20/10/2015	Kristaq KAFERXHI Pandeli FACE	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 611/1 of 7 April 1995 the Korça Commission, modifying its decision no. 611 of 13 January 1995, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 3,099 sq. m. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 500 sq. m in the event of privatisation.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Bafttjar Rusi
58.	53833/15 Lodged on 28/10/2015	Lumturi ZHITI Xhuljeta SKUKA Djana LOLI Maksut ZHITI Besnik ZHITI Vjollca TAKE	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application, which is the same as application no. 42545/15 the details of which have been described above in row no. 46 above, was lodged by other heirs.	Please see the details given in respect of application no. 42545/15 (row no.46 above).	Suela Mëneri
59.	56435/15 Lodged on 10/11/2015	Ylli KOCIBELLINJ Arben KOCIBELLINJ Albana RAKIPI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 93 of 4 February 1997 the Korça Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 75,250 sq. m which would be compensated by means of State bonds in the amount of ALL 1,378,200 (approx. EUR 10,989).	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Sokol Puto
60.	56446/15 Lodged on 10/11/2015	Ali KOSOVA Astrit PERMETI Arjan PERMETI Aida PODGORICA Sokol KOSOVA Shqipe KOSOVA Ermira HYDI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1471 of 28 June 1996 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 10,000 sq. m, of which 6,000 sq. m were restored and 400 sq. m (10 per cent of the remaining area) would be compensated by means of States Bonds.	It would appear that the ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decisions.	Sokol Puto
				By decision no. 1696 of 23 November 1996 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation by means of State bonds in respect of 229.62 sq. m.
				By decision no. 142 of 30 April 2015 the Property Agency, modifying the Durrës Commission decision no. 406 of 1 January 1994, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,000 sq. m, of which 200 sq. m would be compensated in the amount of ALL 3,579,600 (approx. EUR 28,541.4) and the remaining 800 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.
61.	56491/15 Lodged on 10/11/2015	Aleksander MOISIU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 210 of 7 July 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 1,100 sq. m, of which 492 sq. m were restored and the remaining 608 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	Following the ATP’s financial evaluation of decisions no. 210 of 7 July 1995 and no. 210 of 26 February 2008, the applicant has acceded to the accelerated payment scheme, as provided for in the 2015 Property Act, and has expressed his wish to withdraw the application in respect of these two decisions.	Sokol Puto
				By decision no. 210 of 26 February 2008 the Berat Agency recognised the applicant’s right to compensation in respect of 904,421 sq. m.
				By decision no. 388 of 30 July 1997 the Fier Commission recognised the applicant’s right to compensation by means of State bonds in respect of 6,877.2 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of this decision.
				By decision no. 197 of 31 January 2008 the Berat Agency recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 237,664 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of this decision.
				By decision no. 169 of 31 December 2007 the Berat Agency restored the applicant 107,861 sq. m and recognised his right to compensation in respect of 892,139 sq. m.	The applicant has not provided any information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.
62.	57432/15 Lodged on 12/11/2015	Terenzio D’ALENA Maria Cristina D’ALENA Maria Cristina TOCCI Fausta MONACO	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 575 of 19 April 1996 the Tirana Commission restored the applicants 1,188 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 240.57 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
63.	57612/15 Lodged on 17/11/2015	Orion ZAVALANI Dritan ZVALANI Kastriot ZVALANI Sokol ZVALANI Dolora LAMA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 116 of 12 May 1997 the Fier Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 56,000 sq. m which would be compensated by means of State bonds in the amount ALL 1,366,400 (approx. EUR 10,894.8).	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
64.	59814/15 Lodged on 27/11/2015	Makbule MANDIJA Ledina MANDIJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 353 of 31 July 2012 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 2,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Avni Shehu
				By decision no. 354 of 31 July 2012 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 2,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 365 of 3 August 2012 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 6,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
65.	60045/15 Lodged on 27/11/2015	Thoma KOSTA	Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 601 of 1 December 1998 the Gjirokastër Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 3,836 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	It would appear that the ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.
66.	61927/15 Lodged on 14/12/2015	Gazment DIBRA Adnan DIBRA Luan DIBRA Hirma DIBRA Genc DIBRA Artan DIBRA Dashuri DIBRA Ilir DIBRA Nermin DIZDARI Monika ORGOCKA Ingrid TOSKA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 176 of 16 August 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited right to compensation in respect of 926 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Vikor Gumi
67.	62190/15 Lodged on 08/12/2015	Besnik TAFMIZI Belul TAFMIZI Foti NIKOLLA Megi BARJAMAJ Eriketa OSMENAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 739 of 30 October 1996 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decision no. 246 of 25 July 1995, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 4,135 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
68.	62191/15 Lodged on 08/12/2015	Besnik TAFMIZI Belul TAFMIZI Foti NIKOLLA Megi BARJAMAJ Eriketa OSMENAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1260 of 20 September 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited right to in-kind compensation in respect of 2,150 sq. m. It also recognised their right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 980 sq. m in the event of privatisation.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
69.	69/16 Lodged on 16/12/2015	Sotir PIQONI Aleksander PIQONI Vladimir PIQONI Katerina MANUSHI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 114 of 5 February 1996 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 70,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Sinan Tafaj
70.	230/16 12/12/2015	Shqiponja VATHI Luljeta SHUMNERI (née VATHI) Vjollca DIBRA (née VATHI) Lumturije BARDHI (née VATHI) Ahmet VATHI Fadil VATHI Dëshira BEJKO (née VATHI) Shaban VATHI Fatime LELO (née VATHI) Rasim KAIMI Ali KAIMI Sami KAIMI Ridvan KAIMI Eleni LICI Besim (Besmir) KURTI Rezart OKETA Elton OKETA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 441 of 15 February 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 25,450 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
				By decision no. 550 of 3 May 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 6,350 sq. m.
				By decision no. 94 of 25 July 1997 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 12,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.
71.	577/16 Lodged on 29/12/2015	Fatmira KOSTA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 53 of 15 March 2000 the Saranda Commission restored the applicant a plot measuring 3,425 sq. m and recognised her right to compensation in respect of 12,528 sq. m.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.
72.	590/16 Lodged on 19/12/2015	Hekuran HALILI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 500 of 20 March 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 5,860 sq. m, of which 4, 450 sq. m were restored and 360 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. The remaining 1,050 sq. m was restored following the exercise of the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
73.	601/16 Lodged on 19/12/2015	Kumrije RADA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1305 of 28 March 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 1,349.74 sq. m, of which 342 sq. m were restored and 1,007.74 sq. would be compensated in accordance with the law. In 2013 the applicant received financial compensation in respect of 200 sq. m.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Shkelqim Rada
74.	830/16 Lodged on 14/12/2015	Esat KARAPICI Ruzhdi KARAPICI Jemine KARAPICI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 642 of 18 July 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 647 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Ilir Qelija
75.	1360/16 Lodged on 28/12/2015	Elida TOPTANI	Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 114 of 14 April 1995 the Fier Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 19,700 sq. m which would be compensated in the amount of ALL 6,304,000 (approx. EUR 50,610).	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.
76.	3803/16 Lodged on 31/12/2015	Gazment DIBRA Adnan DIBRA Luan DIBRA Hirma DIBRA Genc DIBRA Artan DIBRA Dashuri DIBRA Ilir DIBRA Monika ORGOCKA Ingrid TOSKA Fatmir BABAMETO Bonin TOPTANI Xhimi (qazim) DIBRA Elda KONOMI Nasibe QOSE Drita BOBRATI Nermin DIBRA Rahmi QORALIU Lulzim TOPTANI Astrit TOPTANI Kadri LIBOHOVA Armando LIBOHOVA Xhevat LIBOHOVA Mirjeta BABAMETO Teuta RECI Grabon VRIONI Saimir VRIONI Nervin STAROVA Aurora JEGENI Altin VRIONI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 631 of 15 August 1994 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 883.9 sq. m.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Viktor Gumi
				By decision no. 893 of 1 December 1994 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 635 sq. m, of which 40 sq. m were restored and the remaining 595 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.
				By decision no. 487 of 19 March 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 23,920 sq. m, of which 17,460 sq. m were restored and the remaining 6,460 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.
				By decision no. 633 of 8 July 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,315 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.
				By decision no. 140 of 30 September 1997 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 35,974 sq. m.
				By decision no. 2 of 19 September 2005 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 1,100,110 sq. m.
77.	3809/16 Lodged on 29/12/2015	Ardjan DERHEMI Nazmi DERHEMI Besnike NDONI Qamile LLACI[5] Bedrije LICI Ridian DERHEMI Semiha HUQI Hyrije DUKA Liljana LIKU Iglimona KALAJA Lirije DERHEMI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13	By decision no. 41 of 7 April 1994 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 12,000 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Artan Mertiri
78.	3812/16 Lodged on 30/12/2015	Robert BOROVA	Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application, which is the same as application no. 60045/15 the details of which have been described in row no. 65 above, was lodged by another heir.	Please see the details given in respect of application no. 60045/15 (row no. 65 above).
79.	3826/16 Lodged on 08/01/2016	Altin ISMAILI Petrit ISMAILI Alma TOPALLI (née ISMAILI) Sabrije ISMALILI Safete SINA (née ISMAILI) File ZAJMI (née ISMAILI) Shpresa DIÇI (née ISMAILI) Ilir ISMAILI Skënder ISMAILI Lulzim ISMAILI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 543 of 23 April 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 29,500 sq. m, of which 9,192 sq. m were restored and the remaining 20,308 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
79.	3826/16 Lodged on 08/01/2016			By decision no. 735 of 19 October 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 14,000 sq. m, of which 9,950 sq. m were restored and the remaining 4,050 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.		Xhevdet Sheta
80.	4082/16 Lodged on 07/01/2016	Hysen SARAÇI Pellumb SARAÇI Aishe LLAGAMI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1206 of 3 March 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 33,920 sq. m, of which 10,000 sq. m were restored and the remaining 23,920 sq. m would be compensated.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Xhevdet Sheta
80.	4082/16 Lodged on 07/01/2016	Hysen SARAÇI Pellumb SARAÇI Aishe LLAGAMI		By decision no. 431 of 9 November 2000 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decision no. 157 of 8 March 2000, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 20,168 sq. m.		Xhevdet Sheta
81.	5932/16 Lodged on 22/01/2016	Aleksander GAVOCI Ilir GAVOCI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 373 of 19 December 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 9,851.5 sq. m, of which 1,548 sq. m were restored and 8,053.5 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 2,125 sq. m on the land to be compensated in the event of privatisation.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Aleksander Gavoçi
82.	5938/16 Lodged on 29/01/2016	Lirika KOCIBELLI Jani PEMA Fiqirije KOCIBELLI Florenca HAXHI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 264 of 24 December 1999 the Korça Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 10,000 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Viktor Gumi
83.	6828/16 Lodged on 29/01/2016	Diturije VENXHA Fiqri VENXHA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 649 of 21 April 2000 the Korça District Court, modifying its decision no. 779 of 21 April 1995, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 3,100.25 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Viktor Gumi
83.	6828/16 Lodged on 29/01/2016	Diturije VENXHA Fiqri VENXHA		By decision no. 34 of 14 February 2007 the Korça Agency recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 17,000 sq. m.		Viktor Gumi
84.	6853/16 Lodged on 29/01/2016	Selajdin KUSHE	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1175 of 17 November 1995 the Korça Commission recognised the applicant’s right to compensation in respect of 10,400 sq. m. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Viktor Gumi
85.	7633/16 Lodged on 01/02/2016	Kujtim BORICI Mejreme DIZDARI Behije RUSTEMI Nuredin BORICI Suzana DACI Lindita BORICI Astrit BORICI Lucie COLI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 2488/6 of 21 November 2008 the Property Agency, modifying the Fier Commission decision no. 814 of 21 July 2008, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 1,669.75 sq. m.	It would appear that the ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation.	Endri Kotherja
86.	7645/16 Lodged on 01/02/2016]	Myzejen BYLYKBASHI Mustafa ARAPI Osman ARAPI Minerva KOTHERJA Xhemil GJERGJI Ferzilet SARJA Zedlir BYLYKBASHI Armand BYLYKBASHI Myzejen CAKU Ermira GARUNJA Qazim BYLYKBASHI Enerjeta MALKJA Myrteza KARDHASHI Hysen KARDHASHI Suzana BAKALLI Burbuqe GARUNJA Flora SPAHIU Shejnaz KARDHASHI Makbule SAMARXHIU Rajmonda SHEHETILA	Articles 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 381/2 of 16 September 1994 the Elbasan Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 590 sq. m. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 2,510 sq. m in the event of privatisation. On an unspecified date, it would appear that the applicants became the owners of 1,833.6 sq. m out of 2,510 sq. m.	It would appear that the ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Endri Kotherja
86.	7645/16 Lodged on 01/02/2016]		Articles 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	Following the applicants’ civil action concerning the payment of rent for a plot measuring 876 sq. m in respect of which the right to first refusal had been recognised, the domestic courts dismissed it on the ground that the impugned plot, on which office buildings belonging to a State institution had been constructed in 1969 and were being used in the public interest, had not been restored to the applicants and the authorities had not invited them to exercise the right to first refusal of the buildings. On 17 September 2015 the applicants received notice of the Constitutional Court’s decision which had dismissed their constitutional complaint on 9 June 2015.		Endri Kotherja
87.	8373/16 Lodged on 04/02/2016	Shyqyri HYSKJA Adriano HASTOPALLI Ornela ABDIHOXHA Hysen HYSKJA Loreta QOSJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 21 of 19 April 2016 the Tirana Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,100 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Avni Shehu
88.	8825/16 Lodged on 04/02/2016	Hysen HYSKJA Shyqyri HYSKJA Adriano HASTOPALLI Ornela ABDIHOXHA Loreta QOSJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 473/2 of 26 June 1996 the Elbasan Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 5,341 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Avni Shehu
89.	9833/16 Lodged on 16/02/2016	Tomi PROGRI Arben PROGRI Nestor PROGRI	Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1033 of 25 August 1995 the Korça Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property right to 376 sq. m, of which 100 sq. m were restored and 256 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It further recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of a building occupying 20 sq. m in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Tomi Progri
89.	9833/16 Lodged on 16/02/2016	Tomi PROGRI Arben PROGRI Nestor PROGRI	Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	As a result of the expropriation of the applicants’ inherited property in 1957, in respect of which their inherited property rights were recognised the Korça Commission in 1995, the applicants were allocated a house for which they paid a sum of money as compensation. In the meantime, by decision no. 1126 of 27 October 1995 the Korça Commission recognised a third party’s inherited property rights to the house as well as the underlying plot of land, which the applicants claimed to have been allocated to them in good faith in 1957. It ordered the third party to pay the applicants the value of investment they had made throughout the years, and it further ordered the financial unit of the municipality to pay the applicants the price they had paid in 1957, as indexed over the years. In 2009 the applicants made an application for financial compensation in respect of the award determined in the Commission decision no. 1126 of 27 October 1995. On 16 November 2009 the Property Agency held that the applicants could not be considered expropriated owners within the meaning of that Commission decision as it had recognised the third party’s inherited property rights. Furthermore, the awards made therein could not be considered financial compensation, within the meaning of the 2004 Property Act, which had to be paid by the State. It thus dismissed the application. The applicant’s appeal against the 2009 Property Agency decision was finally dismissed by the Constitutional Court on 8 October 2015.		Tomi Progri
90.	9839/16 Lodged on 11/02/2016	Merita XHAFERAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13	By decision no. 153 of 15 March 2000 the Saranda Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 82,000 sq. m, of which 3,425 sq. m were restored and 12,258 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.
91.	10883/16 Lodged on 18/02/2016	Makbule MANDIJA Ledina MANDIJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13	By decision no. 356 of 31 July 2012 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 50 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Avni Shehu
91.	10883/16 Lodged on 18/02/2016	Makbule MANDIJA Ledina MANDIJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13	By decision no. 122/2 of 16 February 1995 the Shkodra Commission, modifying its decision no. 122 of 17 January 1994, recognised the applicants’ inherited property right to 2,790 sq. m, of which 1,860 sq. m were restored and the remaining 930 sq. m would be compensated. In 2011 the applicants received financial compensation in respect of 200 sq. m.		Avni Shehu
92.	10899/16 Lodged on 19/02/2016	Dylejman SALIAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 672 of 7 August 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 39,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Avni Shehu
93.	11212/16 Lodged on 15/02/2016	Gazmend HASEKIU Manushaqe BEJTJA Nimete TURHANI Engjellushe BUMCI Fatbardha VARDARI Mahmut XHANI Ajla SHISHMANI Arben XHANI Ibrahim HASEKIU Ardjan HASEKIU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application is the same as application no. 26340/15 the details of which have been described in row no. 18 above.	Please see the details given in respect of application no. 26340/15 (row no. 18 above).	Endri Kotherja
94.	14109/16 Lodged on 10/03/2016	Shkëlqim TOPÇIU	Articles 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 80 of 8 July 1997 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 14,000 sq. m, of which 648 sq. m were restored and the remaining 13,352 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 4,358 sq. m on the land to be compensated in the event of privatisation.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Kristaq Traja
95.	14390/16 Lodged on 10/03/2016	Bukurosh GJATA Altin GJATA Agron GJATA Zegjine PEQINI GJEVORI Halime GJATA Rudina GJATA Adela GJATA Engjellushe DHIMITRI	Articles 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application, which is the same as application no. 7645/16 the details of which have been described in row no. 86 above, was lodged by other heirs.	Please see the details given in respect of application no. 7645/16 (row no. 86 above).	Endri Kotherja
96.	16922/16 Lodged on 25/03/2016	Klea SPIRO	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 2755 of 26 October 1995 the Korça District Court, modifying the Korça Commission decision no. 814 of 5 May 1995, recognised the applicant’s right to compensation by means of State bonds in respect of 3,000 sq. m. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Viktor Gumi
97.	18669/16 Lodged on 31/03/2016	Mirjam STERMASI Nezihat STERMASI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 286 of 16 February 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 20,000 sq. m, of which 11,000 sq. m were restored. It did not award any compensation. Following the institution of domestic court proceedings by third parties against the plot of land which had been restored to the applicants, on 26 February 2013 the Supreme Court rejected the applicants’ cassation appeal against the lower courts’ decisions which had annulled the restoration in natura, no right to compensation having been recognised. It transpires that on 30 October 2015 the applicants lodged a fresh claim seeking the restitution and/or compensation of their property, to which no response has been given to date.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting the provision of updated information.	Kristaq Traja
98.	21990/16 Lodged on 15/04/2016	Myzejen RAMA Ikbale MEÇA Bukurije BIDOSHI Behxhet DELIALLISI Petrit DELIALLISI MILLA Kadrije DELIALLISI Adnan DELIALLISI Egon DELIALLISI Gentian DELIALLISI	Articles 6 § 1, 13 and 14 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 106 of 23 November 1995 the Shijak Commission, modifying its decision no. 15 of 13 October 1993, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 100,000 sq. m, of which 10,000 sq. m were restored and the remaining 90,000 sq. m would be compensated by means of State bonds. To date, only 5,000 sq. m have been restored and the remaining 5,000 sq. m have been occupied by unlawful constructions and no compensation has been awarded.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Kristaq Traja
99.	24942/16 Lodged on 27/04/2016	Azis HYSKA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 126 of 26 June 2002 the Berat Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 46,400 sq. m and awarded compensation in the amount of ALL 4,364,800 (approx. EUR 35,041) in respect of 13,640 sq. m.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Edmond Gjini
100.	25951/16 Lodged on 01/05/2016	Skender KOSTURI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 157 of 31 July 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 858 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Edmond Gjini
101.	29345/16 Lodged on 18/05/2016	Mustafa BALLA Avdulla BALLA Kasem BALLA Mediha ÇELA Fatbardha BIBA Myzejen SEFERI Lulzim BALLA Yllka BALLA Adnand BALLA Elda KURTI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1234 of 20 November 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 12,712 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Aida Prifti
102.	29364/16 Lodged on 26/05/2016	Vasillaq KEDHI Aliqi FERRO (née KEDHI) Ana KEDHI (née ANGJELI) Lejdja PAPA (née KEDHI) Josif KEDHI Stiliano KOMATA Eno KOMATA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 332 of 9 June 2000 the Vlora Court of Appeal, modifying the Vlora Commission decision no. 111 of 25 September 1996, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 11,414 sq. m.	It would appear that the ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Endri Kotherja
103.	32655/16 Lodged on 18/05/2016	Myslym BALLA Fadil BALLA Hamit BALLA Mereme SHERA Bakushe KOLA Bukurie LUARI Ermira SPAHIU Mahmut KATROSHI Shkëlqim KATROSHI Nusret BILANI Orkidia BILANI Feliks BILANI	Art. 13, Art. 6 (1), Prot. 1 Art. 1	By decision no. 1235 of 20 November 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 56,000 sq. m, of which 43,610 sq. m were restored and the remaining 12,390 sq. m would be compensated. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings located in the land to be compensated in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Aida PRIFTI
104.	32668/16 Lodged on 25/05/2016	Ismail XHURA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 508 of 28 March 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 800 sq. m, of which 475 sq. m were restored and the remaining 325 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decisions.	Viktor Gumi
				By decision no. 90 of 6 June 2007 the Tirana Property Agency, modifying the Tirana Commission decision no. 23 of 11 August 1999, recognised the applicant’s right to compensation in respect of 832 sq. m.
				By decision no. 158 of 3 February 2006 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s right to compensation in respect of 39,215 sq. m.
				By decision no. 159 of 3 February 2006 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s right to compensation in respect of 770 sq. m.
105.	32686/16 Lodged on 24/05/2016	Kadife TROKSI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 330 of 28 June 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 12,000 sq. m, of which 10,200 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	It would appear that the ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.
106.	32781/16 Lodged on 30/05/2016	Elvira TAKA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application, which is the same as application no. 9839/16 the details of which have been described in row no. 90 above, was lodged by another heir.	Please see the details given in respect of application no. 9839/16 (row no. 90 above).
107.	32785/16 Lodged on 25/05/2016	Vasiliqi XHARAHU Marika PRIFTI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 632 of 17 January 2003 the Gjirokastër Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 4,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Aida Prifti
108.	32791/16 Lodged on 25/05/2016	Kushtrim TAKA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application, which is the same as application no. 9839/16 the details of which have been described in row no. 90 above, was lodged by another heir.	Please see the details given in respect of application no. 9839/16 (row no. 90 above).
109.	32803/16 Lodged on 25/05/2016	Vangjel COKA Geraldina MIHALI Romeo RAMA Jani RAMA Vasken RAMA Valentina ÇOKA Irena ÇOKA Jorgji ÇOKA Nikoleta SKAKA Stavri ÇOKA Andrea NAÇE Robert NAÇE	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 303 of 25 October 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 150,000 sq. m, of which 29,700 sq. m were restored and the remaining 120,300 sq. m would be compensated by means of State bonds.	The ATP, following the financial evaluation of the decision, decided that the applicants were deemed to have been compensated.	Sokol Puto
110.	32866/16 Lodged on 08/06/2016	Artur TAHIRI Drita TAHIRI Aida SHABA Merita KUCI Mirela PEQINI Enriketa BABOCI Arben BULQIZA Arben TAHIRI Hektor TAHIRI Kliton MALI Rigels MALI Ramazan BULQIZA Agron BULQIZA Shpresa RUSHITI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 981 of 10 April 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 766 sq. m, of which 94 sq. m were restored and the remaining 672 sq. m would be compensated.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Viktor Gumi
111.	33126/16 Lodged on 08/06/2016	Klea SPIRO	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 24 of 6 February 2007 the Korça Agency recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 10,060 sq. m, of which 3,900 sq. m were restored and the remaining 6,160 sq. m would be compensated.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Viktor Gumi
112.	35772/16 Lodged on 15/06/2016	Dashamir KAMBERAJ Hydai KAMBERAJ Kozeta PRENDI Mereme ISUFAJ Irena XHUFI Oliver ZAJMI KOTONAJ Aida XHUFI GËRMENJI Shqipe ZAJMI KOTONAJ Luljeta ZAJMI KOTONAJ CINGU Zejnulla ZAJMI Eranda ZAJMI KOTONAJ BEDALLI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 128 of 19 January 2000 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 10,600 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Arben Muka
113.	36716/16 Lodged on 22/06/2016	Avni CENMURATI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 204 of 29 May 2000 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 207 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.
114.	36726/16 Lodged on 22/06/2016	Luftare ALLA
115.	37141/16 Lodged on 22/06/2016	Agim CENMURATI
116.	40735/16 Lodged on 11/07/2016	Fatime LULI Skënder LULI[6] Bukurije DEDEJ Bujar LULI Lindita LULI Drita RROGA Flutura SHAKAJ Fatmir LULI Dhurata KALAJA Ilirjan LULI Dylaver LULI Genci LULI Xheni LULI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application, which is a follow-up to this Court’s judgment in the case of Luli v. Albania, no. 30601/08, 15 September 2015), has been lodged by other heirs in respect of their own shares of land. They complain about the authorities’ failure to pay them compensation in respect of the same domestic decisions.	It would appear that the ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation.	Suela Mëneri
117.	46530/16 Lodged on 04/08/2016	Niko VEIZAJ Krupskaja VEIZAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 853 of 6 June 2002 the Vlora District Court, modifying the Vlora Commission decision no. 47 of 2 July 1994, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 4,300 sq. m, of which 218 sq. m were restored and the remaining 4,082 sq. m would be compensated. By decision no. 973 of 27 January 2014 the Tirana District Court restored the applicants 400 sq. m out of 4,082 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of the remaining 3,682 sq. m.	It would appear that the ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Edmond Gjini
118.	60181/16 Lodged on 12/10/2016	Sude ISMAILI Silvana MEÇA (ISMAILI) Etleva ISMALILI Enkelejda ISMAILI Dilbere ISMAILI Albana GJOKA (ISMAILI) Mimoza HOXHA (ISMAILI) Taulant ISMALILI Ardian ISMAILI Rife SINA Behare SHIMA (KOSOVA) Bashkim SHIMA Ndriçim SHIMA Liljana SHIMA (MEXHITI) Alfred SHIMA Nazmi SHIMA Aida MELHANI (SHIMA) Sherife KRYEZIU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application, which is the same as application no. 3826/16 the details of which have been described in row no. 79 above, was lodged by other heirs.	Please see the details given in respect of application no. 3826/16 (row no. 79 above).	Xhevdet Sheta
119.	63480/16 Lodged on 18/04/2017	Behije NGRACANI Fiqirete LILAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 24 of 22 September 1994 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 50,690 sq. m.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Paulin Paplekaj
120.	63841/16 Lodged on 01/11/2016	Agron DOBI Qefsere DOBI Bujar DOBI Gazmend DOBI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1386 of 14 May 1996 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 41,900 sq. m, of which 9,500 sq. m would be compensated in kind and 3,240 sq. m (10% of the remaining 32,400 sq. m) would be compensated by means of State bonds. It further recognised the right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Edmond Gjini
121.	161/17 Lodged on 23/12/2016	Muharrem SHABA Bakushe MUÇA Zija SHABA Bukurie REÇI Drita SHKALLA Sulltane KEPI Arben SHABA Dallandyshe SHABA Altin SHABA Lulzim HOXHA Silvana KASEMI Shaban SHABA Lavdim SHABA Alfred SHABA Edmond SHABA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 241 of 12 September 1995 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decision no. 19 of 7 January 1994, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 9,361 sq. m.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision has been pending before the Supreme Court since 20 January 2020.	Aida Prifti
121.	161/17 Lodged on 23/12/2016			By decision no. 234 of 14 August 2008 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 175,910 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Aida Prifti
122.	7454/17 Lodged on 17/01/2017	Gjeraqina SULA Arjan SULA Hektor SULA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 430 of 15 April 1994 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 22,072.4 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Gentiana Tirana
				By decision no. 947 of 17 August 1995 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 720 sq. m which would be compensated in kind.
				By decision no. 1612 of 4 October 1996 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 4,000 sq. m, of which 3,250 sq. m was restored and the remaining 750 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.
123.	9957/17 Lodged on 25/01/2017	Isuf TAGA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 216 of 29 March 2000 the Kurbin Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 18,800 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Gentiana Tirana
123.	9957/17 Lodged on 25/01/2017	Isuf TAGA		By decision no. 5 of 20 October 2005 the Lezha Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 77,916 sq. m, of which 69,016 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It further recognised the right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 8,900 sq. m in the event of privatisation.		Gentiana Tirana
124.	22572/17 Lodged on 16/03/2017	Etleva METANI Gëzim REKA Pranvera BEÇI Ylli METANI Hajrie MULLA Besa THAÇI Artan THAÇI Zyhra ZELKA Vjollca MULLA Sabahet BELBA Haxhire RUDAKU Majlinda VRAPI Indira DHIMOGJIKA Myzejen ANGONI Prifti MELIHA Luan METANI Agron THAÇI Agron METANI Dhurata ALLA Robert METANI Lirika METANI Lirie ANAGNOSTOU Bujar METANI Belinda METANI Gazmend METANI Sanie METANI Ermira SHKURTI Mimoza LARUSHKU Bukurije SULA Fatbardha METANI Rovena METANI Erion METANI Artur METANI Denada DIMA Rabije AVDIU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 908 of 7 December 1994 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 9,226 sq. m.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Edmond Gjini
125.	28537/17 Lodged on 10/04/2017	Aneta PRENDI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 449 of 28 August 2000 the Kavaja Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 17,500 sq. m, of which 10,000 sq. m would be compensated in kind and 750 sq. m (10% of the remaining 7,500 aq. m) would be compensated by means of State bonds.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Mirion Theodhosi
126.	35959/17 Lodged on 12/05/2017	Abdon YPI Nevis BREGASI Helga TOPI (YPI) Blendi FEVZIU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 67 of 6 April 2006 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 2,551,937.7 sq. m, of which 179,852 sq. m were restored and the remaining 2,372,085.7 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision on the financial evaluation would appear to be pending before the Supreme Court since 13 May 2020.	Aida Prifti
				By decision no. 283 of 8 January 2008 the Tirana Property Agency restored the applicants 71,568 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 2,062 sq. m. It further recognised the right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decisions.
				By decision no. 154 of 30 June 2008 the Tirana Property Agency restored the applicants 27,052 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 15,146 sq. m.
127.	43319/17 Lodged on 09/06/2017	Petrit DERHEMI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 217 of 5 June 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 33,000 sq. m, of which 9,928 sq. m were restored and 14,672 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law, no decision having been made in respect of the remaining 8,400 sq. m.	The applicant has not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting updated information.	Artan Spahiu
128.	43372/17 Lodged on 14/06/2017	Beqir KALLÇIU Redi KALLÇIU Fatmir KRUTANI Besnik VORPSI Gëzim KALLÇIU Dashamir KALLÇIU Argjent KALLÇIU Fatbardh KALLÇIU Flamur KALLÇIU Suzana KALLÇIU (DEMNERI) Fatime KALLÇIU (née MYDERIZI) Hajdije KALLÇIU Afërdita KALLÇIU (née BEQIRI) Monika KALLÇIU (née XHAFERRI) Fatbardha KALLÇIU Enea KALLÇIU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1701 of 23 November 1996 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 17,000 sq. m, of which 9,367.5 sq. m were restored and 700 sq. m (10% of the remaining 7,000 sq. m) would be compensated by means of State bonds, the applicants having been compensated in respect of 632.5 sq. m by the Durrës Commission decision no. 1501 of 11 July 1996.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Viktor Gumi
129.	53299/17 Lodged on 20/07/2017	Eqerem LIKAJ Majlinda KARALI Enkelejda THIMJO Suzana BRATI Alma LIKAJ Violeta MEMINI Monika MUKA Merita KEÇI Adriano LIKAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 744 of 14 February 1995 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 7,720 sq. m, of which 1,364 sq. m was restored and the remaining 6,356 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Edmond Gjini
130.	53322/17 Lodged on 20/07/2017	Gëzim BALLANCA Emirjeta ÇOADARI Fehmije SINANI Anife ALIKO Yllka BALLANCA Nadire BALLANCA Myzejen ELEZI Elida BALLANCA Prikena TOPALLI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 375 of 27 December 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,329 sq. m, of which 1,167 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It ordered the occupiers of the remaining 162 sq. m to pay rent or buy the land from the applicants.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Edmond Gjini
131.	64201/17 Lodged on 24/08/2017	Sotiraq PEPO Maria RAKO Ina PASHAJ Altea FRASHERI Evri PEPO	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1141 of 3 November 1995 the Korça Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 14,500 sq. m, of which 218 sq. m were restored and 10,428 sq. m, as capped by law, would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decisions.	Besim Peka
131.	64201/17 Lodged on 24/08/2017	Sotiraq PEPO Maria RAKO Ina PASHAJ Altea FRASHERI Evri PEPO		By decision no. 1034 of 25 August 1996 the Korça Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 8,000 sq. m.		Besim Peka
132.	69427/17 Lodged on 16/09/2017	Ilir DERVISHI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1142 of 2 October 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 14,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Ramadan Caco
133.	5514/18 Lodged on 23/01/2018	Lulzim ALLA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 105 of 29 August 1997 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property right to 60,000 sq. m which would be compensated by means of State bonds in the amount of ALL 1,464,000 (approx. EUR 1,166). It further recognised the right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Sinan Tafaj
133.	5514/18 Lodged on 23/01/2018	Lulzim ALLA		By decision no. 113 of 14 October 1997 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 50,000 sq. m which would be compensated by means of State bonds in the amount of ALL 1,220,000 (approx. EUR 9,721). It further recognised the right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Sinan Tafaj
134.	10222/18 Lodged on 22/02/2018	Ilda COBA Regjina ÇOBA Gjon ÇOBA Jozefina TOPALLI Ndrek HARAPI Mari HARAPI Roberto CEA Michele CEA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 34 of 23 September 1993 the Shkodra Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,016 sq. m, of which 516 sq. m were restored and the remaining 500 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. In 2011 applicants received financial compensation in respect of 200 sq. m.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Viktor Gumi
				By decision no. 290 of 26 October 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 783.57 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised their right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation. In 2005 the applicants received financial compensation in respect of 200 sq. m.
				By decision no. 358 of 4 December 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 782 sq. m, of which 30 were restored and the remaining 752 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 1530 of 27 November 1996 the Shkodra Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 6,550 sq. m, of which 1,100 sq. m were restored and 2,400 sq. m would be compensated. It further recognised their right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 3,050 sq. m in the event of privatisation.
135.	13344/18 Lodged on 13/03/2018	Arian BIMO Vjollca ZHULLA Mirvjena LAHA Vilma HOXHA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 50 of 15 January 1997 the Vlora Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 204,500 sq. m, the value of which was assessed to be ALL 3,496,500 (approx. EUR 27,863).	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Arben Muka
136.	14418/18 Lodged on 19/03/2018	Avdulla SGURA Hatixhe HYSNELAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 102 of 23 April 2008 the Tirana Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 10,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants have not provided any response to a letter sent by the Registry on 2 January 2020 requesting information about the authorities’ determination of financial evaluation.	Aleksander Muskaj
137.	16888/18 Lodged on 05/04/2018	Fiqirete BRARI Gëzim BRARI Ymer BRARI Sadete MUÇA Myzejen XHAMETA Hatixhe BULKU Hajrije XHAFA Mahmud BRARI Kume GURAJA Kujtim LUSHA Bledar BRARI Zenepe GARUNJA Xhevit BRARI Lumturi BRARI Agron BRARI Xhemile DELIU Artan BRARI Albert BRARI Bardh BRARI Ilmi BRARI Durim BRARI Sulltane XEXA Merita MEMOÇI Sherife BRARI Sheqere XHAFA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 427 of 19 November 2000 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decision no. 653 of 8 August 1996, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 18,593 sq. m. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP, following the financial evaluation of each decision, decided that the applicants were deemed to have been compensated.	Elton Lula
138.	35329/18 Lodged on 19/07/2018	Lirie HALILI (SHATKU) Iljaz SHATKU Gjyze MUÇA Violeta DERRAJ Emine PERLALA Sulejman KUNIQI Lumturije BARDHI Besnike KUNIQI Ballkize SHATKU Yllka ULI Ana SHATKU Blendi SHATKU Drita SHATKU Fatbardha SHATKU Gentiana SHATKU Viola SHATKU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 61 of 7 June 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 291.5 sq. m, of which 162 sq. m were restored and the remaining 129 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Paulin Paplekaj
139.	44528/18 Lodged on 18/09/2018	Enrik DARRAGJATI Regjina ÇOBA Karolina DARRAGJATI Irma GECI Klorinda RROTA Zef GURAZIU Marina LACUKU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 245 of 22 June 2012 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 6,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision, expect for decision no. 247 of 22 June 2012.	Viktor Gumi
				By decision no. 246 of 22 June 2012 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 4,500 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 247 of 22 June 2012 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 280,000 sq. m, of which 270,390 sq. m was restored and the remaining 9,610 sq. m would be compensated.
				By decision no. 1127 of 6 October 2011 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,424 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 1128 of 6 October 2011 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 97 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 3349 of 9 October 2014 the Tirana Court of Appeal, quashing the Property Agency decision no. 518 of 29 October 2012, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 18,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
140.	45151/18 Lodged on 12/09/2018	Dorinka DEMIRI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	The applicant complains about the non-enforcement of the remainder of the Tirana Commission decision no. 1046 of 30 December 1994, which was not the subject of this Court’s judgment in the case of Siliqi and Others v. Albania [Committee] (nos. 37295/05 and 4228/05, 10 March 2015 – see also row no. 144 below).	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Paulin Paplekaj
140.	45151/18 Lodged on 12/09/2018	Dorinka DEMIRI		By decision no. 316 of 15 November 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s right to compensation in respect of 2,313 sq. m.		Paulin Paplekaj
141.	49997/18 Lodged on 22/10/2018	Klorinda RROTA Rita SHIROKA Geti VELO	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 435 of 25 May 1994 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 343 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. In 2013 the applicants received financial compensation in respect of 200 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Viktor Gumi
141.	49997/18 Lodged on 22/10/2018	Klorinda RROTA Rita SHIROKA Geti VELO		By decision no. 377 of 18 March 1994 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,276.14 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. It further recognised their right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation. In 2013 the applicants received financial compensation in respect of 200 sq. m.		Viktor Gumi
142.	50177/18 Lodged on 17/10/2018	Pjetër RODIQI Analiza STRAZIMIRI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 299 of 30 October 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,212 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Andrea Saccucci
143.	59207/18 Lodged on 12/12/2018	Arben BARONI Zana HARXHI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 383 of 4 May 1994 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,516 sq. m, of which 145 sq. m were restored and the remaining 1,371 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The applicants submitted that the ATP had carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Viktor Gumi
				By decision no. 616 of 4 January 1996 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decisions no. 1332 of 28 March 1995 and no. 383 of 4 May 1994, restored the applicants 1,232 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 1,1,183 sq. m.
				By decision no. 1000 of 29 May 1996 the Tirana Commission restored the applicants 4.8 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 6.3 sq. m.
				By decision no. 1001 of 29 May 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 35 sq. m.
				By decision no. 39 of 27 May 1997 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 555 sq. m which was restored.
144.	5251/19 Lodged on 19/01/2019	Marina SHUNDI Andrea SHUNDI Jorita MIHALI Olimpia GJINO MIHALI Laura KONDA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	The applicants complain about the non-enforcement of the remainder of the Tirana Commission decision no. 1046 of 30 December 1994, which was not the subject of this Court’s judgment in the case of Siliqi and Others v. Albania [Committee] (nos. 37295/05 and 4228/05, 10 March 2015 – see also row no. 140 above).	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Ardjana Shehi Kalo
145.	6074/19 Lodged on 23/01/2019	Lirije BARDHOSHI Genti BARDHOSHI Sonila PAPINOVA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 474 of 3 November 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 960 sq. m of which 297 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Suela Meneri
				By decision no. 475 of 3 November 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 172 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 477 of 3 November 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 107 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
146.	7381/19 Lodged on 29/01/2019	Nirvana NASI Laura KONDA Ana TIRANA Nikolla ROÇI Roberta TIRANA Nina GURRA (TIRANA) Nik TIRANA Diana KAÇULINI Alma MIÇAÇO Irena OROLLOGA Evanthi MUNGULI Ileana MUZINA Lirije KOJA Kozeta KOJA SMITH Mihal KOJA Laura KOJA Ermira SHUNDI Darinka DEMIRI SILIQI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 97/6 of 12 May 1995 the Elbasan Commission decided that the applicants were to be compensated in respect of 2,035 sq. m. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 1,880 sq. m in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision.	Paulin Paplekaj
147.	17731/19 Lodged on 29/03/2019	Fitnet XHUGLINI Dhurata XHUGLINI Meliz XHUGLINI Bulent XHUGLINI Marlind XHUGLINI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 59 of 31 May 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 690 sq. m, of which 345 sq. m were restored and the remaining 345 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision	Suela MENERI
148.	25067/19 Lodged on 03/05/2019	Nirvana NASI Laura KONDA Ana TIRANA Nikolla ROÇI Roberta TIRANA Nina GURRA (TIRANA) Nik TIRANA Diana KAÇULINI Alma MIÇAÇO Irena OROLLOGA Evanthi MUNGULI Ileana MUZINA Lirije KOJA Kozeta KOJA SMITH Mihal KOJA Laura KOJA Ermira SHUNDI Darinka DEMIRI SILIQI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 183/3 of 30 June 1994, which related to decision no. 526 of the same date, the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 6,400 sq. m, of which 5,000 sq. m were to be restored and the remaining 1,400 sq. m would be compensated in kind in a tourist area.	The ATP, following the financial evaluation of the decision, decided that the applicants were deemed to have been compensated.	Paulin Paplekaj
149.	32381/19 Lodged on 07/06/2019	Dielli SHEHI Ylli SHEHI Teuta URUÇI Lumturi KUÇI Hana Sina Laureta SEREZI Aida BEJTULLA Nermin Habibi	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 35 of 11 November 2005 the Tirana Commission, modifying its decision no. 501 of 27 March 1996, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 103,680 sq. m, of which 49,700 sq. m were to be restored and the remaining 53,980 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP, following the financial evaluation of the decision, decided that the applicants were deemed to have been compensated.	Avni Shehu
150.	52875/19 Lodged on 04/10/2019	Shkelqim KOKOMANI Fadile KOKOMANI Marsen NUZI Anila PAPA Pranvera REXHAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 206 of 29 December 1993 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation by means of State bonds in respect of 15,500 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Arben Muka
151.	64499/19 Lodged on 09/12/2019	Mark JAKOVA Nikolina BERISHA Elisabeta BENUSSI Ferdinand SHAHINI Rozeta KËÇIRA Irena BENUSSI Silva ÇOBA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 347 of 23 November 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 800 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law. In 2009 the applicants received financial compensation in respect of 200 sq. m.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Suela MENERI
152.	11661/20 Lodged on 10/02/2020	Ibrahim PEJTAMALLI Xhemal PEJTAMALLI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	On 14 November 2014 the Elbasan District Court, quashing a decision given by the Property Agency, recognised the applicants’ right to compensation in respect of 32,000 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.	Atmir Mani
153.	18563/20 Lodged on 02/04/2020	Lirije BARDHOSHI Genti BARDHOSHI Sonila PAPINOVA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 48 of 22 November 2005 the Tirana Commission restored the applicants 1,736 sq. m and recognised their right to compensation in respect of 40,295 sq. m (40,000 sq. m having been restored by the Commission decision no. 1268 of 26 March 1995, as amended by the Tirana District Court decision no. 1585 of 21 October 1997).	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ appeal against the ATP decision was rejected by the Administrative Court of Appeal.	Suela MENERI
154.	18582/20 Lodged on 06/04/2020	Lirije DERHEMI Sezai TURKU Paqize MULLABRAHIMI Flutura CANKJA Mimoza FRASHËRI Astrit TURKU Florinda BAZO Genc AGALLIU Shkëlqim TURKU Edlira TURKU Alban TURKU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 335 of 14 November 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 15,000 sq. m, of which 4,137 sq. m were restored and 10,763 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP, following the financial evaluation of the decision, decided that the applicants were deemed to have been compensated.	Suela MENERI
155.	22859/20 Lodged on 17/01/2020	Skënder ÇOÇOLI Florinda KOVAÇI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	Pursuant to Article 388 et al. of the Code of Civil Procedure, in 1994 the applicants obtained three separate court decisions acknowledging the existence of a legal fact that their ancestors used to own certain properties (vendim vërtetimi fakti juridik). Relying on those court decisions, by decision no. 214 of 21 November 2008, which supplemented the Lezha Commission decisions nos. 34 of 14 December 1994 and 34/1 of 6 June 1995, the Lezha Agency restored the applicants 79,444,000 sq. m and recognised their right to in-kind compensation in respect of 2,000 sq. m.	The ATP has not carried out the financial evaluation of the decision.
156.	31827/20 Lodged on 13/07/2020	Vasil RUCI Josif CANGANA Eftimia CANGANA Anila KALACI Liri ISMAILI Kumrije DULI Skënder STAFAJ Vera ALILI Qemal STAFAJ Kujtim STAFAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application, which is the same as application no. 69427/17 the details of which have been described in row no. 132 above, was lodged by other heirs.	Please see the details given in respect of application no. 69427/17 (row no. 132 above).	Ramadan Çaço

Table 2

No.	Application no. Date of introduction	Applicant’s name	Article	Description of final domestic decisions	Enforcement details	Represented by
157.	22372/15 Lodged on 04/05/2015	Ehsen KËLLIÇI Deniz KËLLIÇI Suzana KËLLIÇI Edi Dani	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application, which is a follow-up to application no. 34770/09, as decided in this Court’s judgment in the case of Manushaqe Puto and Others v. Albania, nos. 604/07 and 3 others, 31 July 20122015, has been lodged by other heirs in respect of their shares of land. They complain about the authorities’ failure to pay them compensation in respect of the same domestic decisions.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decisions, and the applicant’s appeal against the ATP decisions is pending before the Administrative Court of Appeal.	Edlira TARTARI
158.	24081/15 Lodged on 14/05/2015	Sejfulla SURELI Aishe HYKA Drita VILA Sabrie ÇAUSHI Niazi SURELI Selime CIKU Suzana BALLGURI Hava SURELI Duhie SURELI Zyra SURELI Xhevrie SURELI Majlinda MANIGHETTI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 461 of 8 November 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 70,270 sq. m, of which 10,000 sq. m were restored and the remaining 60,270 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the right to first refusal of some buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Sokol PUTO
159.	42546/15 Lodged on 20/08/2015	Sulejman XHELEPI Nexhmije PREZA Zija XHELEPI Mediha HIDA[7] Selim XHELEPI Florjan XHELEPI Alket XHELEPI Enver XHELEPI Naime XHELEPI Aferdita VARVARICA Hava KUSI Nafije KODRA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 536 of 8 September 2011 the Property Agency, modifying the Tirana Commission no. 833 of 5 April 1996, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 23,000 sq. m, of which 12,106.1 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying a total of 2,217.3 sq. m.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Suela MENERI
160.	54397/15 Lodged on 26/10/2015	Franko KOVAÇI Zef KOVAÇI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 238 of 27 September 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 990 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri KOTHERJA
161.	57873/15 Lodged on 18/11/2015	Shkelqim CANI Mustafa CANI Vjollca VARGU (née CANI) Jalldyz GRIPSHI (née CANI) Pranvera SEJDINI (née CANI) Manushaqe EKMEKÇIU (née CANI)	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 93 of 15 November 1995 the Peqin Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 5,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri KOTHERJA
162.	61015/15 Lodged on 03/12/2015	Zef KOVAÇI Franko KOVAÇI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 731 of 16 October 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 960 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri KOTHERJA
163.	873/16 Lodged on 14/12/2015	Minerva KOTHERJA Xhemil GJERGJI Ferzilet SARJA Zedlir BYLYKBASHI Armand BYLYKBASHI Myzejen CAKU Ermira GARUNJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 10/1 of 29 October 1998 the Elbasan Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 32,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri KOTHERJA
164.	880/16 Lodged on 24/12/2015	Lila KARAJ Fatime SHINGJERGJI Engjellushe QOSHKU Isuf KARAJ	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 302/2 of 8 September 1995 the Elbasan Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 9,700 sq. m which would be compensated in State bonds in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Administrative Court of Appeal.	Endri KOTHERJA
165.	887/16 Lodged on 23/12/2015	Fatmir HARUNAJ Lumturi HARUNAJ BAJRAMI Engjellush HARUNAJ Fatosh HARUNAJ Mevlan HARUNAJ Shkelqim HARUNAJ Pullumb HARUNAJ Genci HARUNAJ Elisabeta HARUNAJ VREKAJ Donika HARUNAJ PJETRI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 149 of 29 May 2003 the Vlora Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 250 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri KOTHERJA
166.	1376/16 Lodged on 17/12/2015	Hava KRASNIQI Nexhmije SALIU (DULA)	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 197 of 30 August 1996 the Kavaja Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 4,000 sq. m which would be compensated by property of the same kind in a tourist area (kompensohet me sipërfaqe ekuivalente në zonë turistike).	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Administrative Court of Appeal.	Endri KOTHERJA
167.	3821/16 Lodged on 30/12/2015	Gezim PETI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 704 of 29 September 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 24,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicant’s cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri KOTHERJA
168.	4250/16 Lodged on 04/01/2016	Altin GJATA Mustafa ARAPI Osman ARAPI Minerva KOTHERJA Xhemil GJERGJI Ferzilet SARJA Zedlir BYLYKBASHI Armand BYLYKBASHI Myzejen CAKU Ermira GARUNJA Myzejen BYLYKBASHI Qazim BYLYKBASHI Enerjeta MALKJA Agron GJATA Zegjine PEQINI GJEVORI Halime GJATA Rudina GJATA Adela GJATA Engjellushe DHIMITRI Bukurosh GJATA Myrteza KARDHASHI Hysen KARDHASHI Suzana BAKALLI Burbuqe GARUNJA Flora SPAHIU Shejnaz KARDHASHI Makbule SAMARXHIU Rajmonda SHEHETILA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 381/2 of 16 September 1994 the Elbasan Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 590 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of both decisions, and the applicants’ appeal against the ATP decisions is pending before the Administrative Court of Appeal. The applicants submitted that the court has stayed the proceedings without providing any reasons relating to such a stay of the proceedings.	Endri KOTHERJA
168.	4250/16 Lodged on 04/01/2016			By decision no. 381/4 of 21 September 1994 the Elbasan Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 64 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.		Endri KOTHERJA
169.	8595/16 Lodged on 05/02/2016	Odin LIBOHOVA Mimoza LIBOHOVA Silven LIBOHOVA Erval LIBOHOVA Seres TURKU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 353 of 9 December 2008 the Tirana Property Agency, modifying the Tirana Commission decision no. 434 of 6 February 1995, recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 102,247 sq. m, of which 17,905 sq. m were restored and the remaining 82,894 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It further recognised the right to first refusal of some buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decisions, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Andrea Saccucci
170.	18017/16 Lodged on 28/03/2016	Selman ÇOMO Behixhe KAZAZI Bekim ÇOMO Trim ÇOMO Alije STOJANI Ilir ÇOMO Jeta VYSHKA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 24 of 3 September 1999 the Gjirokastër Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 4,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri KOTHERJA
171.	22009/16 Lodged on 28/03/2016	Selman ÇOMO Behixhe KAZAZI Bekim ÇOMO Trim ÇOMO Alije STOJANI Ilir ÇOMO Jeta VYSHKA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 467 of 17 October 1997 the Gjirokastër Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 2,148 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri KOTHERJA
172.	24962/16 Lodged on 29/04/2016	Fatma BUKMISHI Abdulla BUKIMISHI Ramazan BUKIMISHI Naile BUKIMISHI Fatmir BUKIMISHI[8] Florinda BUKIMISHI Ermela LEKA Ilirjana PRUSHA Altin AHMATAS Silvana KALLUSHI	Articles 6 § 1, 13 and 14 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 195 of 6 May 1997 given by the Durrës Commission, as amended by court decisions given in 2002 and 2003 as well as the Property Agency decision no. 374 of 26 December 2007, the applicants were restored 15,786 sq. m and they would be compensated in respect of 17,036 sq. m. Furthermore, the decision recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of some buildings occupying 6,250 sq. m in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the Durrës Commission decision, as amended, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Elvana Deshati
173.	26672/16 Lodged on 05/05/2016	Trim ÇOMO Selman ÇOMO Behixhe KAZAZI Bekim ÇOMO Alije STOJANI Ilir ÇOMO Jeta VYSHKA Fete ÇABEJ Saide SHEHU Afërdita KOKA Dhurata MINERALI Ezine GJOLEKA Vedat ÇOMO Munir ÇOMO Rahmi ÇOMO Bashkim ÇOMO Durim ÇOMO Dodona KASMI Shunqufet SHEHU Feraset PETANI Ixhlal AVDO Shaniko XHELAJ Afrim ÇOMO Vjollca FEMER Çlirim ÇOMO Danzike KIKA Bekim KULLA Jolldez KULLA Betarice RUHI Krenar RUHI Perlat RUHI Kujtim RUHI Briseida MEMA Diana CUKALLA Qeriman JANI Nordi THELLIMI Mifaret ÇOMO Valo LATE Lindor ÇOMO Zishan MECANI Vullnet ÇOMO Artur ÇOMO Roland ÇOMO Rezarta ÇOMO Gazmir ÇOMO Perika ÇOMO Antualeta ÇOMO Shpëtim ÇOMO Fisnik ÇOMO Virtit ÇOMO Përparim ÇOMO Gjernar ÇOMO Bujar ÇOMO Naile KASIMATI Manushaqe KASIMATI Fatbardha KUMBARO Lumturie MUSTAFAJ Qefajete ZOTAJ Viktori ÇOMO Perlat ÇOMO Agim ÇOMO Artan ÇOMO Rajmonda ÇOMO Gladiola ÇOMO Merita ÇOMO Tomorr ÇOMO Engjellushe ÇOMO Musine ÇOMO Virgjinush GJATA Vitori RESULI Atdhe ÇOMO Luan ÇOMO Mahmudie ÇOMO Nevila ÇOMO Ledia ÇOMO Mynever ÇOMO Pranvera ÇOMO Lutfi HAXHI Qefsere KARAGJOZI	Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 34 of 15 April 1999 the Lushnja Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 25 hectares of which 1 hectare was to be restored and 15.9 hectares would be compensated by means of State bonds in the amount of ALL 4,452,000 (approx. EUR 35,800).	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of both decisions, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decisions is pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri KOTHERJA
174.	27507/16 Lodged on 13/05/2016		Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 2 of 5 April 1996 the Gjirokastër Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 70,000 sq. m which would be compensated by means of State bonds in the amount of ALL 1,470,000 (approx. EUR 11,821). It further recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings in the event of privatisation.		Endri KOTHERJA
175.	52909/16 Lodged on 01/09/2016	Nexhmije SALIU (née DULA) Hava KRASNIQI	Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 50 of 1 November 1994 the Kavaja Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,685 sq. m which would be compensated by property of the same kind in a tourist area (kompensohet me sipërfaqe ekuivalente në zonë turistike).	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Administrative Court of Appeal.	Endri KOTHERJA
176.	54698/16 Lodged on 13/09/2016	Ali SULA Pranvera KARAPICI Zana SHAMI Sabire GABECI Admand SULA	Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 430 of 24 May 1994 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 22,072.4 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri KOTHERJA
177.	27133/17 Lodged on 05/04/2017	Uran DRAGONI	Articles 6 § 1, 13 and 14 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1050 of 30 December 1994 the Tirana Commission, modifying and supplementing its decision no. 426 of 25 May 1994, recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 24,240 sq. m, of which 2,062 sq. m were restored and the remaining 22,178 sq. m would be compensated by means of State bonds. It also recognised the applicant’s right to first refusal of some buildings occupying 10,980 sq. m of the plot of land to be compensated in the event of privatisation	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision and the proceedings concerning the amount of compensation are pending before the Supreme Court.	Elvana Deshati
178.	32114/17 Lodged on 24/04/2017	Besnik GUGLIETTI	Articles 6 § 1, 13 and 14 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 195 of 6 May 1997, as supplemented by decision no. 374 of 26 December 2007, the Durrës Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 40,000 sq. m, of which 22,964 sq. m were restored and the remaining 17,036sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicant’s cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Elvana DESHATI
179.	39827/18 Lodged on 17/08/2018	Vediha SHTRAZA Mimoza HADO Ardiana KACERJA Manjola XHIKU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 163 of 7 July 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 879.5 sq. m, of which 52 sq. m were restored and the remaining 827.5 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. Also, it recognised the right to first refusal of some buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decisions, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Suela Meneri
180.	41256/18 Lodged on 28/08/2018	Nine SHLLAKU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 201 of 30 August 1995 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s right to compensation in respect of 855.14 sq. m in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicant’s cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Suela Meneri
181.	41462/18 Lodged on 29/08/2018	Agim KOÇILLARI Hysen KOÇILLARI Proveta SADIKU Hane LIKJA Nexhmije XHAFA Mitat MANOKU Hekurije LLUPO Myfarete SOLLAKU Tiko TOPI Fildus BEQIRI Violeta KUQI Natasha MANOKU Hajri MANOKU Mimoza BEQIRI Dhimitër MANOKU	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 63 of 31 March 1994 the Lushnja Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 5,000 sq. m which would be compensated by means of State bonds. Also, it recognised the right to first refusal of some buildings in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Suela Meneri
182.	46045/18 Lodged on 27/09/2018	Marjana HOXHA Engjëllushe BASHA Besim HOXHA Ylli HOXHA Florian HOXHA Marsida SUVARIJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 455 of 16 February 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 155 sq. m, of which 20 sq. m were restored and the remaining 135 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Suela Meneri
183.	46053/18 Lodged on 27/09/2018	Shehrjare SESERI Nafije SESERI Osman PATORI Roland PATORI Aida MARTIRO Lulzim SESERI Ilira TASHO Ervin PATORI Mirjeta PATORI Rudina SESERI Elvana MYRTA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 705 of 15 September 1994 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 430 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Suela Meneri
184.	18499/19 Lodged on 04/04/2019	Genc DRINI Bardhyl DRINI Karolina DRINI	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 452 of 12 February 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 799.16 sq. m, of which 190 sq. m were restored and the remaining 609.19 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Suela MENERI
185.	25065/19 Lodged on 02/05/2019	Muhamet ZAJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 60 of 7 March 1997 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 88,860 sq. m which would be compensated in State bonds.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Suela MENERI
186.	11666/20 Lodged on 12/02/2020	Shkelqim FORTUZI Agron FORTUZI Bukurije DOMI (FORTUZI) Fiqirete DANAJ (FORTUZI) Ilir FORTUZI Qazim FORTUZI Sherif FORTUZI Zelije GJUZI (FORTUZI)	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	Pursuant to Article 388 et al. of the Code of Civil Procedure, in 1996 the applicants obtained a court decision acknowledging the existence of a legal fact that their ancestors used to own certain properties (vendim vërtetimi fakti juridik). Relying on that court decision, on 4 June 2010 the Durrës Property Agency recognised their inherited property rights to 465,000 sq. m and their right to compensation in respect of 447,000 sq. m. That decision became final on 18 July 2012.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Andrea SACCUCCI
187.	14853/20 Lodged on 08/03/2020	Fadil KASMI	Articles 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 169 of 14 October 2008 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 10,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision, and the applicant’s cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.	Brikena KASMI
				By decision no. 170 of 14 October 2008 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 8,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
				By decision no. 187 of 15 August 2011 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 7,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.
188.	14854/20 Lodged on 12/03/2020			By decision no. 149 of 26 September 2008 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicant’s inherited property rights to 53,000 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicant’s cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court.
189.	18568/20 Lodged on 01/04/2020	Siri PETRELA Alide JARECI Edvar AGALLIU Aida VISARI Genci JASA Ani JASA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 576 of 24 May 1996 the Tirana Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 47,500 sq. m, of which 26,000 sq. m were restored and 17,280 sq. m would be compensated in accordance with the law. It also recognised the applicants’ right to first refusal of certain buildings occupying 3,542 sq. m in the event of privatisation.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Administrative Court of Appeal.	Suela MENERI
190.	18573/20 Lodged on 01/04/2020	Eliana BABOCI Shkendi SELENICA Zana SELENICA Taras BEGEJA Bujar BEGEJA Dritan SAKO Elira SELENICA Gentian SAKO Helidon SELENICA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 1326 of 24 November 2011 the Property Agency recognised the applicants’ inherited property rights to 1,055 sq. m which would be compensated in accordance with the law.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeal against the ATP decision is pending before the Supreme Court. Also, the applicants’ appeals against other implementing decisions adopted by the Government are pending before the domestic courts.	Suela MENERI
191.	18578/20 Lodged on 09/04/2020	Dhionisa PRENDA Apostol PRENDA Vasilika MOCKA Liri PRENDA Alqi PRENDA Gaqo APOSTOL Shpresa APOSTOL Valter PRENDA Flutura AHMETI Gjergji PRENDA Natalia MAGJISTARI Roberta PRENDA Vjollca DEMIRAJ Ilir MAGJISTARI Elda KASAPI Anila PRENDA Genti PRENDA Mario PRENDA Flonja PRENDA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	By decision no. 47 of 5 November 1996 the Korça Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation by means of State bonds in the amount of ALL 55,797 (approx. EUR 449) in respect of 9,000 sq. m.	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of each decision, and the applicants’ cassation appeals against the ATP decision are pending before the Supreme Court.	Suela MENERI
191.	18578/20 Lodged on 09/04/2020			By decision no. 1409 of 23 May 1997 the Korça Commission recognised the applicants’ right to compensation by means of State bonds in respect of 8,000 sq. m.		Suela MENERI
192.	21585/20 Lodged on 24/04/2020	Minerva KOTHERJA	Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1	This application is the same as application no. 70211/13 which was declared inadmissible by the Court in its decision in the case of Gjergji and Others v. Albania ((dec.) [Committee] (no. 13618/10 and 76 other applications, 8 September 2020).	The ATP has carried out the financial evaluation of the domestic decision, and the applicant’s cassation appeal against the ATP decision would appear to be pending before the Supreme Court.	Endri Kotherja

[1] As substituted by her heirs: Ema DAJA, Artur DAJA and Aida REPISHTI

[2] As substituted by his heirs: Elida KOTHERJA, Elvis KOTHERJA and Dored KOTHERJA

[3] As substituted by his heirs: Julian KURTI, Shefikat KURTI and Glenda KURTI

[4] As substituted by her heirs: Bedar LLAGAMI and Etleva BELIU

[5] As substituted by her heirs: Ilir LLACI, Kosta LLACI, Nexhmi LLACI and Ruzhdi LLACI

[6] As substituted by his heirs: Deshira LULI, Shpetim LULI and Etleva MECE

[7] As substituted by her heirs: Miranda HIDA and Server HIDA

[8] As substituted by his heirs: Zana BUKMISHI, Fatma BUKMISHI, Florinda BUKMISHI and Ilirjana PRUSHA