Přehled

Text rozhodnutí
Datum rozhodnutí
18.9.2025
Rozhodovací formace
Významnost
3
Číslo stížnosti / sp. zn.

Rozhodnutí

SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 52089/20
Necati YENİCE against Türkiye
and 5 other applications
(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 18 September 2025 as a Committee composed of:

Gediminas Sagatys, President,
Stéphane Pisani,
Juha Lavapuro, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

  • FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 of the Convention, concerning decisions of the prison authorities to prohibit visits and/or telephone calls at weekends and the complaint of the applicant in application no. 52089/20 under Article 3 of the Convention concerning allegedly inadequate conditions of his detention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letters.

By letters dated 16 April 2025, sent via the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms) and by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of the observations expired on 14 March 2025 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicants or their representatives have downloaded the eComms letters, except for application no. 15322/21 (even though the previous correspondence was successfully downloaded), and received the letters sent by post on various dates. However, no response has followed.

  • THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications.

Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 9 October 2025.

Viktoriya Maradudina Gediminas Sagatys
Acting Deputy Registrar President


APPENDIX

List of applications

No.

Application no.

Case name

Lodged on

Applicant
Year of Birth

Represented by

1.

52089/20

Yenice v. Türkiye

12/11/2020

Necati YENİCE
1971

Semra KISA

2.

3542/21

Çelenli v. Türkiye

30/12/2020

Engin ÇELENLİ
1983

Muhammed Talha YILMAZ

3.

4205/21

Sağır v. Türkiye

16/11/2020

Kemal SAĞIR
1974

Mustafa ARIKAN

4.

11924/21

Avcı v. Türkiye

18/02/2021

Zeki AVCI
1977

Ömer Faruk DÖNMEZ

5.

12922/21

Söylemez v. Türkiye

12/01/2021

Halit SÖYLEMEZ
1986

6.

15322/21

Öztürk v. Türkiye

10/02/2021

Oğuz ÖZTÜRK
1985

Zeynep Betül EROĞUL