Přehled
Rozsudek
THIRD SECTION
CASE OF DMITRUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 36571/21 and 37 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
13 November 2025
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Dmitruk and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Úna Ní Raifeartaigh, President,
Mateja Đurović,
Vasilka Sancin, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 23 October 2025,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
- JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
- JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
- ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). It further refers to its recent findings, in so far as the application by the authorities of the COVID-19-related restrictions to assemblies are concerned (see Nemytov and Others v. Russia, nos. 1257/21 and 2 others, 27 May 2025).
9. In the leading case of Nemytov and Others, cited above, the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see further Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
- OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its well-established case-law (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, §§ 106-225, 26 April 2016, relating to disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of solo manifestations; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention).
- REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention and its Protocols concerning other aspects of the alleged unfairness of the administrative-offence proceedings, the right to examine witnesses and the right not to be tried twice. In view of the findings in paragraph 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
- APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
- Decides to join the applications;
- Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
- Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints;
- Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
- Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);
- Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 13 November 2025, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Úna Ní Raifeartaigh
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No. | Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant’s name Year of birth | Representative’s name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative / criminal offence | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] |
36571/21 03/07/2021 | Georgiy Aleksandrovich DMITRUK 1999 | Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy Velikiy Novgorod 23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 20 hours’ community service | Novgorod Regional Court 04/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
36775/21 13/07/2021 | Nikita Vadimovich PONOMAREV 1996 | Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy Nizhniy Novgorod 23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 25/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
38160/21 16/07/2021 | Viktoriya Valeryevna TABACHKOVA 1983 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy St Petersburg 31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 02/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021- Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
38163/21 16/07/2021 | Mark Andreyevich BOGDANOV 1998 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy St Petersburg 31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | 5 days’ administrative arrest | St Petersburg City Court 05/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings, Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence imposed on the applicant by the trial court was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
38183/21 16/07/2021 | Angelina Yuryevna VASILYEVA 1994 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy St Petersburg 02/02/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | 3 days’ administrative arrest | St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – arrest on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings, Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence imposed on the applicant by the trial court was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
38192/21 16/07/2021 | Vladimir Yuryevich ZHURAVLEV 1992 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy St Petersburg 02/02/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | 10 days’ administrative arrest | St Petersburg City Court 11/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings, Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence imposed on the applicant by the trial court was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
40348/21 30/07/2021 | Aleksandr Sergeyevich MISHCHENKO 1998 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally “Free Navalnyy” St Petersburg 31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | 5 days’ administrative arrest | St Petersburg City Court 16/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings, Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the administrative arrest imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
40612/21 25/07/2021 | Nadezhda Sergeyevna KALYAMINA 1989 | Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg | Manifestation against war in Ukraine Nevskiy Prospekt, St Petersburg 02/03/2022 Manifestation against the sentence in the "Network" case St Petersburg 22/06/2020 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 15 days’ administrative arrest fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 17/03/2022 St Petersburg City Court 27/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 22/06/2020 and on 02/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of both sets of proceedings, Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence imposed on the applicant by the trial court was executed immediately, as a result, she completed serving the sentence on the day her appeal was examined | 5,000 | |
40627/21 25/07/2021 | Sergey Aleksandrovich MARGELOV 1979 | Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy Bryansk, 23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 and fine of RUB 1,500 | Bryansk Regional Court 30/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of both sets of the proceedings | 4,000 | |
42576/21 12/08/2021 | Natalya Anatolyevna LONGINOVA 1995 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Moscow | Rally “Free Navalnyy” Yakutsk 23/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Sakha Republic 26/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 23/01/2021- Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
43766/21 23/08/2021 | Nigmatulla Musayevich NIGMATULLIN 1998 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Rally “Free Navalnyy” Omsk 23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Omsk Regional Court 06/04/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
50627/21 29/09/2021 | Andrey Alekseyevich KOLESOV 1994 | Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna Novorossiysk | Rally “Free Navalnyy” Novorossiysk 31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Krasnodar Regional Court 29/03/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
52096/21 30/09/2021 | Natalya Vladimirovna ZOTOVA 1982 | Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna Novorossiysk | Anti-corruption rally Novorossiysk 23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | 4 days’ administrative arrest | Krasnodar Regional Court 31/03/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings, Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of a suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
53926/21 23/10/2021 | Yuliya Pavlovna LUKINA 1983 | Loktev Sergey Aleksandrovich St Petersburg | Rally “Free Navalnyy” St Petersburg 31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg Court 03/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
56958/21 19/11/2021 | Aleksandr Nikolayevich LUCHNIKOV 1991 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally “Free Navalnyy” Perm 31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Perm Regional Court 31/05/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
58198/21 27/11/2021 | Vladislav Yevgenyevich DUBOV 1998 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally “Free Navalnyy” Voronezh 31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Voronezh Regional Court 01/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
58201/21 27/11/2021 | Marat Ravilevich RYAZAPOV 1974 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally “Free Navalnyy” Saratov 21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Saratov Regional Court 27/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings) | 4,000 | |
58261/21 27/11/2021 | Dilshod Ibragimovich SHARIPOV 1994 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally “Free Navalnyy” Voronezh 31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Voronezh Regional Court 21/07/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
58300/21 27/11/2021 | Aleksandr Viktorovich ANDREYEV 1989 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally “Free Navalnyy” St Petersburg 31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City court 24/06/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
58303/21 27/11/2021 | Natalya Alekseyevna BOBROVA 1967 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally “Free Navalnyy” St Petersburg 23/01/2021 | fine of RUB 4,000 | Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg 01/06/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | ||
60877/21 03/12/2021 | Pavel Sergeyevich BURAK 1992 | Kamakin Maksim Ivanovich St Petersburg | Rally “Free Navalnyy” St Petersburg 31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 13,000 | St Petersburg City Court 08/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.03 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.53 p.m. on 01/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
36871/22 13/07/2022 | Yuliya Aleksandrovna AKSENOVA | Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war protest St Petersburg 03/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | 15 days’ administrative arrest | St Petersburg City Court 14/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 03/03/2022 to 04/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings, Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
38824/22 27/07/2022 | Zakhar Aleksandrovich LISITSYN 1997 | Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg | Anti-war protest St Petersburg 24/02/2022 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 29/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 24/02/2022 to 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
38828/22 27/07/2022 | Polina Igorevna BAZHENOVA 2001 | Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg | Anti-war protest St Petersburg 24/02/2022 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 17/05/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 24/02/2022 to 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
39707/22 05/08/2022 | Sergey Andreyevich VERESHCHAGIN 1984 | Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine St Petersburg 26/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 | St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 26/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of both sets of the administrative proceedings, Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - Administrative conviction under article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO for solo-picketing against the war in Ukraine on 30/04/2022 in St Petersburg / administrative fine of RUB 31,000/ St Petersburg City Court on 16/06/2022 | 5,000 | |
46213/22 07/09/2022 | Viktoriya Vadimovna BANCHAK 1993 | Tkachenko Ilya Valeryevich Kogalym | Anti-war protest St Petersburg 24/02/2022 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 17/05/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 24/02/2022 to 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (raised in the administrative proceedings) | 4,000 | |
47601/22 14/09/2022 | Pavel Sergeyevich KARPUS 1976 | Podolskiy Sergey Viktorovich St Petersburg | Anti-war protest St Petersburg 26/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 17/05/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 7.55 p.m. on 26/02/2022 to 5.10 p.m. on 27/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
47693/22 22/09/2022 | Matvey Andreyevich KOVESHNIKOV 2003 | Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul | Anti-war protest St Petersburg 24/02/2022 Manifestation against war in Ukraine St Petersburg 13/03/2022 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 7 days’ administrative arrest | St Petersburg City Court 28/06/2022 St Petersburg City Court 21/06/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 24/02/2022 and 13/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of both sets of the proceedings, Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence imposed on the applicant by the trial court on 14/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
48731/22 05/10/2022 | Aleksandr Vladimirovich TREGUBOV 1992 | Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg | Anti-war protest St Petersburg 25/02/2022 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 07/06/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
48751/22 20/09/2022 | Andrey Olegovich IVANOV 1991 | Pilipenko Anastasiya Vladimirovna St Petersburg | Anti-war protest St Petersburg 06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 26/05/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - | 4,000 | |
50623/22 23/09/2022 | Anastasiya Sergeyevna AKIMOVA 1996 | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine St Petersburg 02/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 24/05/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 02/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | ||
50652/22 13/10/2022 | Olga Yuryevna BUBERMAN 1981 | Ivanov Nikifor Yuryevich St Petersburg | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine St Petersburg 13/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 | St Petersburg City Court 14/06/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 13/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,550 | |
50654/22 13/10/2022 | Anastasiya Nikolayevna CHIKENEVA 1989 | Ivanov Nikifor Yuryevich St Petersburg | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine St Petersburg 13/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | 14 days’ administrative arrest | St Petersburg City Court 14/06/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 13/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings, Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative arrest imposed on the applicant on 14/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
51522/22 28/09/2022 | Aleksandr Alekseyevich TRUSHIN 2000 | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine Novosibirsk 06/03/2022 | article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 7,000 | Novosibirsk Regional Court 07/06/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention from 2.11 p.m. to 10.05 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | ||
52426/22 27/10/2022 | Sergey Anatolyevich ZIZDOK 1988 | Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine Moscow 03/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 11/07/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 03/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
53818/22 26/10/2022 | Monika Albertovna BASTRON 2001 | Magomedova Luiza Magomedovna St Petersburg | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine St Petersburg 02/04/2022 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg City Court 25/08/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – Arrest and detention on 02/04/2022 - Applicant taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
53822/22 26/10/2022 | Aleksey Viktorovich KASATKIN 1962 | Magomedova Luiza Magomedovna St Petersburg | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine St Petersburg 24/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 28/06/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – Arrest and detention on 24/02/2022 - Applicant taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
4989/23 08/01/2023 | Yuliya Vitalyevna SAYASOVA 1996 | Shiolashvili Mikhail Germanovich St Petersburg | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine St Petersburg 27/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg City Court 15/09/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 27/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings) Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.