Přehled

Text rozhodnutí
Datum rozhodnutí
13.11.2025
Rozhodovací formace
Významnost
3
Číslo stížnosti / sp. zn.

Rozsudek

THIRD SECTION

CASE OF DMITRUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 36571/21 and 37 others –

see appended list)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

13 November 2025

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of Dmitruk and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

Úna Ní Raifeartaigh, President,
Mateja Đurović,
Vasilka Sancin, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 23 October 2025,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 6873, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION

7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.

8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). It further refers to its recent findings, in so far as the application by the authorities of the COVID-19-related restrictions to assemblies are concerned (see Nemytov and Others v. Russia, nos. 1257/21 and 2 others, 27 May 2025).

9. In the leading case of Nemytov and Others, cited above, the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see further Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).

10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.

11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its well-established case-law (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, §§ 106-225, 26 April 2016, relating to disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of solo manifestations; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention).

  1. REMAINING COMPLAINTS

14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention and its Protocols concerning other aspects of the alleged unfairness of the administrative-offence proceedings, the right to examine witnesses and the right not to be tried twice. In view of the findings in paragraph 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its caselaw (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);
  6. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 13 November 2025, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Viktoriya Maradudina Úna Ní Raifeartaigh

Acting Deputy Registrar President


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative / criminal offence

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

36571/21

03/07/2021

Georgiy Aleksandrovich DMITRUK

1999

Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich

Velikiy Novgorod

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Velikiy Novgorod

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

20 hours’ community service

Novgorod Regional Court

04/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

36775/21

13/07/2021

Nikita Vadimovich PONOMAREV

1996

Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich

Velikiy Novgorod

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Nizhniy Novgorod

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court

25/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

38160/21

16/07/2021

Viktoriya Valeryevna TABACHKOVA

1983

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

St Petersburg

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

02/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021- Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

38163/21

16/07/2021

Mark Andreyevich BOGDANOV

1998

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

St Petersburg

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

5 days’ administrative arrest

St Petersburg City Court

05/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence imposed on the applicant by the trial court was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5,000

38183/21

16/07/2021

Angelina Yuryevna VASILYEVA

1994

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

St Petersburg

02/02/2021

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

3 days’ administrative arrest

St Petersburg City Court

11/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – arrest on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence imposed on the applicant by the trial court was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5,000

38192/21

16/07/2021

Vladimir Yuryevich ZHURAVLEV

1992

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

St Petersburg

02/02/2021

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

10 days’ administrative arrest

St Petersburg City Court

11/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence imposed on the applicant by the trial court was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5,000

40348/21

30/07/2021

Aleksandr Sergeyevich MISHCHENKO

1998

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

St Petersburg

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

5 days’ administrative arrest

St Petersburg City Court

16/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the administrative arrest imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5,000

40612/21

25/07/2021

Nadezhda Sergeyevna KALYAMINA

1989

Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna

St Petersburg

Manifestation against war in Ukraine

Nevskiy Prospekt, St Petersburg

02/03/2022

Manifestation against the sentence in the "Network" case

St Petersburg

22/06/2020

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

15 days’ administrative arrest

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

17/03/2022

St Petersburg City Court

27/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 22/06/2020 and on 02/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of both sets of proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence imposed on the applicant by the trial court was executed immediately, as a result, she completed serving the sentence on the day her appeal was examined

5,000

40627/21

25/07/2021

Sergey Aleksandrovich MARGELOV

1979

Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna

St Petersburg

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Bryansk,

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000 and fine of RUB 1,500

Bryansk Regional Court

30/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of both sets of the proceedings

4,000

42576/21

12/08/2021

Natalya Anatolyevna LONGINOVA

1995

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Moscow

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

Yakutsk

23/01/2021

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Sakha Republic

26/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 23/01/2021- Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

43766/21

23/08/2021

Nigmatulla Musayevich NIGMATULLIN

1998

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

Omsk

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Omsk Regional Court

06/04/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

50627/21

29/09/2021

Andrey Alekseyevich KOLESOV

1994

Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna

Novorossiysk

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

Novorossiysk

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Krasnodar Regional Court

29/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

52096/21

30/09/2021

Natalya Vladimirovna ZOTOVA

1982

Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna

Novorossiysk

Anti-corruption rally

Novorossiysk

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

4 days’ administrative arrest

Krasnodar Regional Court

31/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of a suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5,000

53926/21

23/10/2021

Yuliya Pavlovna LUKINA

1983

Loktev Sergey Aleksandrovich

St Petersburg

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

St Petersburg

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

St Petersburg Court

03/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

56958/21

19/11/2021

Aleksandr Nikolayevich LUCHNIKOV

1991

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

Perm

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Perm Regional Court

31/05/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

58198/21

27/11/2021

Vladislav Yevgenyevich DUBOV

1998

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

Voronezh

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

01/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

58201/21

27/11/2021

Marat Ravilevich RYAZAPOV

1974

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

Saratov

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Saratov Regional Court

27/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings)

4,000

58261/21

27/11/2021

Dilshod Ibragimovich SHARIPOV

1994

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

Voronezh

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

21/07/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

58300/21

27/11/2021

Aleksandr Viktorovich ANDREYEV

1989

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

St Petersburg

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City court

24/06/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

58303/21

27/11/2021

Natalya Alekseyevna BOBROVA

1967

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

St Petersburg

23/01/2021

fine of RUB 4,000

Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg

01/06/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

60877/21

03/12/2021

Pavel Sergeyevich BURAK

1992

Kamakin Maksim Ivanovich

St Petersburg

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

St Petersburg

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 13,000

St Petersburg City Court

08/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.03 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.53 p.m. on 01/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

36871/22

13/07/2022

Yuliya Aleksandrovna AKSENOVA

Baranova Natalya Andreyevna

Moscow

Anti-war protest

St Petersburg

03/03/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

15 days’ administrative arrest

St Petersburg City Court

14/03/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 03/03/2022 to 04/03/2022 -

Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5,000

38824/22

27/07/2022

Zakhar Aleksandrovich LISITSYN

1997

Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest

St Petersburg

24/02/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

29/03/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 24/02/2022 to 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

38828/22

27/07/2022

Polina Igorevna BAZHENOVA

2001

Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest

St Petersburg

24/02/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

17/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 24/02/2022 to 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

39707/22

05/08/2022

Sergey Andreyevich VERESHCHAGIN

1984

Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna

St Petersburg

Manifestation against the war in Ukraine

St Petersburg

26/02/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 5,000

St Petersburg City Court

12/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 26/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of both sets of the administrative proceedings,

Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - Administrative conviction under article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO for solo-picketing against the war in Ukraine on 30/04/2022 in St Petersburg / administrative fine of RUB 31,000/ St Petersburg City Court on 16/06/2022

5,000

46213/22

07/09/2022

Viktoriya Vadimovna BANCHAK

1993

Tkachenko Ilya Valeryevich

Kogalym

Anti-war protest

St Petersburg

24/02/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

17/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 24/02/2022 to 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (raised in the administrative proceedings)

4,000

47601/22

14/09/2022

Pavel Sergeyevich KARPUS

1976

Podolskiy Sergey Viktorovich

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest

St Petersburg

26/02/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

17/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 7.55 p.m. on 26/02/2022 to 5.10 p.m. on 27/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

47693/22

22/09/2022

Matvey Andreyevich KOVESHNIKOV

2003

Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna

Barnaul

Anti-war protest

St Petersburg

24/02/2022

Manifestation against war in Ukraine

St Petersburg

13/03/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

7 days’ administrative arrest

St Petersburg City Court

28/06/2022

St Petersburg City Court

21/06/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 24/02/2022 and 13/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of both sets of the proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence imposed on the applicant by the trial court on 14/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5,000

48731/22

05/10/2022

Aleksandr Vladimirovich TREGUBOV

1992

Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest

St Petersburg

25/02/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

07/06/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

48751/22

20/09/2022

Andrey Olegovich IVANOV

1991

Pilipenko Anastasiya Vladimirovna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest

St Petersburg

06/03/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

26/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings -

4,000

50623/22

23/09/2022

Anastasiya Sergeyevna AKIMOVA

1996

Manifestation against the war in Ukraine

St Petersburg

02/03/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

24/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 02/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

50652/22

13/10/2022

Olga Yuryevna BUBERMAN

1981

Ivanov Nikifor Yuryevich

St Petersburg

Manifestation against the war in Ukraine

St Petersburg

13/03/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 5,000

St Petersburg City Court

14/06/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 13/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,550

50654/22

13/10/2022

Anastasiya Nikolayevna CHIKENEVA

1989

Ivanov Nikifor Yuryevich

St Petersburg

Manifestation against the war in Ukraine

St Petersburg

13/03/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

14 days’ administrative arrest

St Petersburg City Court

14/06/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 13/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative arrest imposed on the applicant on 14/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5,000

51522/22

28/09/2022

Aleksandr Alekseyevich TRUSHIN

2000

Manifestation against the war in Ukraine

Novosibirsk

06/03/2022

article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 7,000

Novosibirsk Regional Court

07/06/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention from 2.11 p.m. to 10.05 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

52426/22

27/10/2022

Sergey Anatolyevich ZIZDOK

1988

Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna

St Petersburg

Manifestation against the war in Ukraine

Moscow

03/03/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

11/07/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 03/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

53818/22

26/10/2022

Monika Albertovna BASTRON

2001

Magomedova Luiza Magomedovna

St Petersburg

Manifestation against the war in Ukraine

St Petersburg

02/04/2022

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

St Petersburg City Court

25/08/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – Arrest and detention on 02/04/2022 - Applicant taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

53822/22

26/10/2022

Aleksey Viktorovich KASATKIN

1962

Magomedova Luiza Magomedovna

St Petersburg

Manifestation against the war in Ukraine

St Petersburg

24/02/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

28/06/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – Arrest and detention on 24/02/2022 - Applicant taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: there is no evidence/assessment that it was impossible to draw up an offence record on the spot (Article 27.2 § 1 of the CAO) and to achieve the goals set by Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g., to identify the suspect (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

4989/23

08/01/2023

Yuliya Vitalyevna SAYASOVA

1996

Shiolashvili Mikhail Germanovich

St Petersburg

Manifestation against the war in Ukraine

St Petersburg

27/02/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

St Petersburg City Court

15/09/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 27/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings)

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.