Přehled

Rozhodnutí

SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 37505/24
Tibor CSÉCSEI against Hungary
and 9 other applications

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 16 October 2025 as a Committee composed of:

Stéphane Pisani, President,
Juha Lavapuro,
Hugh Mercer, judges,

and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Court received friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the abovementioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 13 November 2025.

Attila Teplán Stéphane Pisani
Acting Deputy Registrar President


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention

(excessive length of criminal proceedings)

No.

Application no.
Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Other complaints under wellestablished case-law

Date of receipt of Government’s declaration

Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

37505/24

04/12/2024

Tibor CSÉCSEI

1969

Szabó Gábor

Göd

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings

24/09/2025

06/05/2025

2,000

2053/25

09/01/2025

Milán WÁGNER

1971

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings

23/09/2025

13/05/2025

2,600

3929/25

16/01/2025

Sándor János ALMÁSY

1996

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings

24/09/2025

15/05/2025

2,600

4180/25

01/02/2025

István András

SAHIN-TÓTH

1974

Ragány Zoltán

Szeged

23/09/2025

16/05/2025

3,300

4238/25

28/01/2025

Péter KOVÁCS

1984

Szabó Gábor

Göd

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings

15/09/2025

07/02/2025

3,900

9345/25

06/03/2025

Zoltán BENKŐ

1972

Pátzay Péter Pál

Budapest

09/09/2025

24/06/2025

7,300

10091/25

27/03/2025

András MELKVI

1977

Szabó Gábor

Göd

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings

09/09/2025

16/06/2025

1,800

12951/25

14/04/2025

Kálmán DOLÁNYI

1991

Kiss Dániel Bálint

Budapest

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings

09/09/2025

25/07/2025

1,800

14139/25

25/04/2025

Kálmán LAKATOS

1989

Szabó Gábor

Göd

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings

08/09/2025

01/07/2025

2,600

14382/25

30/04/2025

Viktor UJ

1981

Takács Gergely Tihamér

Budapest

08/09/2025

30/06/2025

2,700


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.