Přehled
Rozsudek
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF RODIONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 579/19 and 61 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
20 April 2023
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Rodionov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
María Elósegui, President,
Mattias Guyomar,
Kateřina Šimáčková, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 30 March 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers and participants of nationwide protests that took place in various Russian cities on 5 May 2018 before Vladimir Putin’s inauguration for the fourth presidential term. The applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
- JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
- jurisdiction
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
- ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers and participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies, and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
- OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 61-65, 13 February 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to administrative escorting to and detention in a police station beyond three hours without any justification; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, related to the absence of a prosecuting party in criminal proceedings governed by the Code of Administrative Offences (“the CAO”); Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 402-78, 7 February 2017, regarding restrictions on location or time of public events; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018, and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, related to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
- REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention.
15. Firstly, the Court considers that, in view of its findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, there is no need to deal separately with the remaining complaints raised by some applicants under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of the fairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings.
16. Furthermore, the Court has examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.
17. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
- APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
18. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
19. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
- Decides to join the applications;
- Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
- Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible;
- Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
- Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
- Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 20 April 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina María Elósegui
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No. | Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant’s name Year of birth | Representative’s name and location | Location | Administrative charges | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well‑established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] |
579/19 10/12/2018 | Yuriy Anatolyevich RODIONOV 2000 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Voronezh | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Voronezh Regional Court 26/06/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO; Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events – local administration’s refusal to approve the date and location of the rally on 05/05/2018 in Voronezh planned by the applicant (notification procedure, final decision: Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 04/09/2018). | 3,500 | |
1485/19 14/12/2018 | Olga PEROVA 1994 | Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk | Cheboksary | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Republic of Chuvashia 19/07/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
1529/19 14/12/2018 | Vasiliy KERIMOV 1987 | Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk | Cheboksary | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Republic of Chuvashia 17/07/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
2545/19 13/12/2018 | Nikolay Alekseyevich KUTUZOV 1990 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | St Petersburg | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 26/06/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
2645/19 24/12/2018 | Georgiy Sergeyevich KRAYNEV 1992 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Togliatti | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Samara Regional Court 03/07/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
2823/19 26/12/2018 | Igor Mikhaylovich ZHURAVLEV 1962 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Kaluga | Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 | Kaluga Regional Court 10/07/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
2898/19 25/12/2018 | Vyachslav Dmitriyevich SIZOV 1994 | Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan | Novokuznetsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Kemerovo Regional Court 25/06/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
3598/19 02/01/2019 | Roman Olegovich SEMEYKO 1995 | Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich Moscow | Moscow | Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 1,000 | Moscow City Court 02/07/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
3831/19 29/12/2018 | Kirill Vladislavovich TIMCHENKO 1996 | Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi | Krasnodar | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Krasnodar Regional Court 11/07/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO. | 4,000 | |
3843/19 29/12/2018 | Vilen Nikolayevich DEMIN 1997 | Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi | Krasnodar | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 detention of 1 day | Krasnodar Regional Court 03/07/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO. | 4,000 | |
3853/19 29/12/2018 | Andrey Borisovich YAKIMOV 1996 | Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi | Krasnodar | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 fine of RUB 500 | Krasnodar Regional Court 10/07/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO. | 4,000 | |
4078/19 06/12/2018 | Karina Aleksandrovna KUPRIYANOVA 1995 | Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk | Chelyabinsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 | Chelyabinsk Regional Court 15/08/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
4080/19 06/12/2018 | Anton Sergeyevich PEREKOPSKIY 1999 | Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk | Chelyabinsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Chelyabinsk Regional Court 03/10/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
4484/19 03/01/2019 | Sergey Borisovich MELNIKOV 1977 | Charskiy Vladimir Valentinovich Saratov | Saratov | Article 20.2 § 6.1 CAO | detention of 2 days | Saratov Regional Court 03/07/2018 | 4,000 | ||
5159/19 15/01/2019 | Sergey Alekseyevich SKVORTSOV 1996 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Kostroma | Article 20.2 § 3 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Kostroma Regional Court 17/07/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 3 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
5322/19 26/12/2018 | Vladimir Yevgenyevich ARZHANOV 1998 | Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan | Novokuznetsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Kemerovo Regional Court 27/06/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
5363/19 06/12/2018 | Viktoriya Olegovna SHAT 1999 | Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk | Chelyabinsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Chelyabinsk Regional Court 17/10/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
5654/19 28/12/2018 | Ilya Vladislavovich CHUMAKOV 1998 | Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk | Krasnoyarsk | Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | detention of 5 days | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 05/07/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO; Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
5857/19 15/01/2019 | Aleksandr Yuryevich PESKOV 1996 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Arkhangelsk | Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Arkhangelsk Regional Court 17/07/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
6360/19 14/01/2019 | German Aleksandrovich KOBYCHEV 1998 | Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 26/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; detention at the police station for more than 3 hours: from 6.25 p.m. to 10.09 p.m. with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
6391/19 21/01/2019 | Pavel Vladimirovich KRASILNIKOV 1999 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Vladimir | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 | Vladimir Regional Court 04/09/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
6423/19 11/01/2019 | Grigoriy Leonidovich GIRA 1984 | Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich Moscow | Ukhta | Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 11/07/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
6546/19 21/01/2019 | Maksimilian Sergeyevich RUBLEV 1999 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Vladimir | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 | Vladimir Regional Court 11/09/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
6562/19 21/01/2019 | Maksim Vasilyevich PLYUSNIN 1982 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | St Petersburg | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 28/08/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
6568/19 21/01/2019 | Yegor Dmitriyevich KAZARINOV 1997 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Vladimir | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 | Vladimir Regional Court 11/09/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
6647/19 21/01/2019 | Oleg Vadimovich PESTRIKOV 1997 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 04/09/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; detention in excess of 3 hours: from 3.10 p.m. on 05/05/2018 to 10.10 a.m. on 07/05/2018 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
11010/19 15/02/2019 | Aleksey Nikolayevich USOV 1990 | Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna Moscow | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 16/08/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; detention in excess of 3 hours: from 7 p.m. on 05/05/2018 to 7 a.m. on 06/05/2018 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
11250/19 14/02/2019 | Vadim Nikolayevich VERESHCHAGIN 1993 | Chervonnyy Grigoriy Sergeyevich Moscow | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 20/08/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; detention in excess of 3 hours from 5.50 p.m. on 05/05/2018 to 5.30 p.m. on 07/05/2018 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
11308/19 17/01/2019 | Mikhail Mikhaylovich FEDOROV 1999 | Charskiy Vladimir Valentinovich Saratov | Saratov | Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Saratov Regional Court 17/08/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; detention in excess of 3 hours: from 5.55 p.m. on 01/07/2018 to 11.15 a.m. on 02/07/2018 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
11672/19 20/02/2019 | Ruslan Andreyevich STARIKOVSKIY 1997 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Kostroma | Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 | Kostroma Regional Court 10/10/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
13617/19 22/02/2019 | Vladimir Aleksandrovich BULATOV 1985 | Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy d’Anjou | Kirov | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Kirov Regional Court 23/08/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
13627/19 17/02/2019 | Danil Valeryevich BOLSHAKOV 1992 | Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk | Krasnoyarsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | community work of 35 hours | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 23/08/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
13776/19 17/02/2019 | Yuriy Mamukayevich ORESHNIKOV 1999 | Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk | Krasnoyarsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 18/10/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
16178/19 12/03/2019 | Viktor Yevgenyevich KOZLENKO 1997 | Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk | Krasnoyarsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | community work of 30 hours | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 13/09/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
16241/19 05/03/2019 | Yevgeniy Yuryevich MIROSHNIK 1987 | Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg | St Petersburg | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 06/09/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; detention at the police station from 6.30 p.m. on 05/05/2018 to 5.15 a.m. on 06/05/2018 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
16614/19 11/03/2019 | Stanislav Viktorovich RUDKOVSKIY 1989 | Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk | Krasnoyarsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 13/09/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
17163/19 20/03/2019 | Ivan Nikolayevich BOYKOV 1991 | Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna Moscow | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 20/09/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; detention at the police station in excess of 3 hours: from 7 p.m. on 05/05/2018 to 5.11 a.m. on 06/05/2018 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
19485/19 02/04/2019 | Kirill Yuryevich AFONIN 1997 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 1,000 | Moscow City Court 28/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
19710/19 01/04/2019 | Anton Anatolyevich LYSENKO 2000 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 1,000 | Moscow City Court 14/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; detention at the police station in excess of 3 hours: from 7.50 p.m. on 05/05/2018 to 3.20 a.m. on 06/05/2018 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
19752/19 01/04/2019 | Sofya Gyrmayevna KASSAYE 1979 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 1,000 | Moscow City Court 20/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
19796/19 01/04/2019 | Ilya Ilyich LATOKHIN 1999 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 22/01/2019 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
19798/19 01/04/2019 | Georgiy Pavlovich NEKRASOV 1992 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Smolensk | Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Smolensk Regional Court 24/10/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
19841/19 02/04/2019 | Vladislav Aleksandrovich ALEKSEYEV 1969 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 20/11/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
19853/19 02/04/2019 | Aleksey Eduardovich PARTOLIN 2000 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 26/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
19954/19 02/04/2019 | Aleksandr Aleksandrovich ALYABYEV 1986 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 06/02/2019 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
20051/19 01/04/2019 | Aleksey Maksimovich CHEREDNICHENKO 1995 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 08/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; detention at the police station in excess of 3 hours: from 3 p.m. on 05/05/2018 to 9.53 a.m. on 07/05/2018 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
20275/19 02/04/2019 | Vsevolod Aleksandrovich KVASHNIN 1993 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Yekaterinburg | Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 23/10/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
20429/19 02/04/2019 | Aleksandr Sergeyevich SAKHAROV 1991 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 16/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
20461/19 21/03/2019 | Lev Yevgenyevich GYAMMER 2000 | Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan | Novokuznetsk | Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Kemerovo Regional Court 14/01/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
20987/19 01/04/2019 | Dmitriy Dmitriyevich KOZHANOV 1996 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Perm | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Perm Regional Court 07/11/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
21180/19 01/04/2019 | Daniil Yevgenyevich POLIANCHIK 1987 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 1,000 | Moscow City Court 20/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
21959/19 02/04/2019 | Viktor Valeryevich NIKOLAYEV 1979 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 28/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
24850/19 16/04/2019 | Aleksandra Sergeyevna MURAVYEVA 1989 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 18/10/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
25172/19 18/04/2019 | Sergey Anatolyevich POLYAKOV 1971 | Sidorkina Svetlana Ivanovna Moscow | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 04/02/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
26229/19 30/04/2019 | Polina Alekseyevna APANOVICH 1999 | Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich Moscow | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 30/10/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
27789/19 14/05/2019 | Natalya Igorevna ANDREYEVA 2000 | Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk | Krasnoyarsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 15/11/2018 | 3,500 | ||
28353/19 06/05/2019 | Dmitriy Aleksandrovich YEGOROV 1995 | Nisanbekova Elza Rinatovna Kazan | Kazan | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan 07/11/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | |
28965/19 06/05/2019 | Vadim Markovich BRAYNIN 1974 | Saratov | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Saratov Regional Court 15/11/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 | ||
31664/19 28/05/2019 | Anton Sergeyevich KIRGIZOV 1994 | Balog Natalya Andreyevna Krasnoyarsk | Krasnoyarsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 29/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
32092/19 28/05/2019 | Mikhail Ivanovich KUZNETSOV 1978 | Charskiy Vladimir Valentinovich Saratov | Saratov | Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention of 2 days | Saratov Regional Court 29/11/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO. | 5,000 | |
32937/19 13/06/2019 | Nikita Sergeyevich FOMICHEV 1999 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Moscow | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 28/02/2019 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and escorting to the police station on 05/05/2018 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence: no evidence / assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record and achieve the objectives set out in the CAO; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 4,000 | |
34126/19 19/06/2019 | Valeriya Aleksandrovna IOVA 1986 | Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk | Krasnoyarsk | Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 20/12/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. | 3,500 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.