Přehled

Text rozhodnutí
Datum rozhodnutí
14.12.2023
Rozhodovací formace
Významnost
3
Číslo stížnosti / sp. zn.

Rozhodnutí

FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 26118/13
Pasquale RUSSO and Others against Italy
and 2 other applications

(see appended table)

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 14 December 2023 as a Committee composed of:

Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President,
Lətif Hüseynov,
Ivana Jelić, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by M. Ferraro, a lawyer practising in Palma Campania.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 concerning the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of “Pinto” domestic decisions were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Government submitted a declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

The Government acknowledged the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of “Pinto” domestic decisions. They further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The Government also undertook to ensure the enforcement of the domestic decisions under consideration in the cases concerned (see appended table) within the same three-month period, and to pay any costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings.

The payment and the enforcement of the domestic decisions in the cases concerned will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.


Done in English and notified in writing on 18 January 2024.

Viktoriya Maradudina Krzysztof Wojtyczek
Acting Deputy Registrar President



APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1

(non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of “Pinto” domestic decisions)

No.

Application no.
Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Relevant domestic decision

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government’s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance

Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage

per applicant

(in euros)[1]

Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application

(in euros)[2]

26118/13

09/04/2013

(5 applicants)

Pasquale RUSSO

1966

Gaetano DE MARTINO

1937

Antonio PAGLIARO

1971

Agostino PATALANO

1972

Mario Alessandro Antonio TAGLIALATELA

1943

Ferraro Massimo

Palma Campania

Naples Court of Appeal,

R.G. 2019/2018,

18/11/2019

Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings - The applicants claim to still be victims of a violation of Art. 6 for the excessive length of the main proceedings since the Pinto decision acknowledging the violation and awarding compensation has not been enforced by the Government to date (Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01,

§ 87-90, ECHR 2006-V).

02/10/2023

02/11/2023

200

30

17608/14

18/12/2013

(6 applicants)

Dario ROTONDO

1956

Vincenzo BIANCO

1949

Mario Rosario CERASUOLO

1963

Carmine D’ANTUONO

1932

Rosaria D’ANTUONO

1965

Salvatore LATORRACA

1932

Ferraro Massimo

Palma Campania

Naples Court of Appeal,

R.G. 1469/18,

16/10/2018

Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings - The applicants claim to still be victims of a violation of Art. 6 for the excessive length of the main proceedings since the Pinto decision acknowledging the violation and awarding compensation has not been enforced by the Government to date (Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01,

§ 87-90, ECHR 2006-V).

11/10/2023

02/11/2023

200

30

47879/16

06/08/2016

Carmela NUNZIATA

1943

Ferraro Massimo

Palma Campania

Naples Court of Appeal,

R.G. 11/2021,

30/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings - The applicant claims to still be a victim of a violation of Art. 6 for the excessive length of the main proceedings since the Pinto decision acknowledging the violation and awarding compensation has not been enforced by the Government to date (Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01,

§ 87-90, ECHR 2006-V).

02/10/2023

02/11/2023

200

30


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

[2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.